Oval Office onslaught II...

---

Just a follow-up really to the previous post and to the mass of red flags; “the mass of red flags already raised in the 2020 POTUS election is getting to banana republic proportions.” And to the Five More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms [The Federalist] “Surely the journalist class should be intrigued by the historic implausibility of Joe Biden’s victory. That they are not is curious, to say the least.” …yep. Sadly, expected though, in the UK we have the same problem. 

More on The American Spectator from Patrick Basham, Director of The Democracy Institute: Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzling.

"To say out-loud that you find the results of the 2020 presidential election odd is to invite derision. You must be a crank or a conspiracy theorist. Mark me down as a crank, then. I am a pollster and I find this election to be deeply puzzling. I also think that the Trump campaign is still well within its rights to contest the tabulations. Something very strange happened in America’s democracy in the early hours of Wednesday November 4 and the days that followed. It’s reasonable for a lot of Americans to want to find out exactly what."

It is an eye-opening read about many of the red flags; I have summarised, quoted, emphasised, edited slightly or paraphrased: 

President Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking re-election.
Ninety-five percent of Republicans voted for him.
He earned the highest share of all minority votes for a Republican since 1960.

Trump increased his share of the national Hispanic vote to 35 percent.
Bellwether states swung further in Trump’s direction than in 2016. Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied America’s media polls with huge wins for Trump. Only once since 1852 has a candidate lost after winning this trio (in 1960; John F. Kennedy's victory is still the subject of great suspicion). 

Biden’s black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory. He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states, which is highly unusual for the presidential victor. 

We are told that Biden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history. But he won a record low of 17 percent of counties…yet somehow outdid Obama in total votes. 

The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a ‘red wave’ in the House, where they gained many seats while winning all 27 toss-up contests. Trump’s party did not lose a single state legislature and made gains at the state level. 

Non-polling metrics: party registrations trends/ primary votes/ candidate enthusiasm/ social media followings/ broadcast and digital media ratings/ online searches/ the number of small donors/ the number of individuals betting on each candidate. These metrics have a 100% percent record predicting the winner during the modern era. Every non-polling metric forecast Trump’s re-election. For Trump… to lose, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every single one had to be wrong, and at the very same time… 

In the article there follows a list of peculiarities, which also lack ‘compelling explanations’, including: many swing states stopped counting ballots and/or continued without the observers; statistically abnormal vote counts (spikes) were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio. 

Late arriving ballots were counted/ impossible or extraordinary postal return dates (over 100k votes in PA alone in this category). The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail in ballot envelopes, historically low absentee ballot rejection rates; missing votes/ voting machine USB cards. Non-resident voters: in Georgia alone, this category alone is larger than Biden’s winning vote margin. Serious ‘chain of custody’ breakdowns. Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases…

Statistical anomalies. In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. 

Yet the MSM both sides of the Atlantic play dumb, insist on calling Biden “President-elect”, erroneously, and just play on The Donald’s inability to accept defeat. This is sinsiter and evil. 

[edit 11:51] From the Federalist link above and underlining one of the anomalies in the non-polling metrics: "In the past, primary vote totals have been remarkably accurate in
predicting general election winners"... "no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election"... President Trump "received 94 percent of the primary vote"... ... and at the same time "set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent", in fact that was almost DOUBLE the previous high.  

"For Biden to
prevail in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the
primaries, turns a century’s worth of prior election data on its head."

Like I said, sinister and evil and yet most of the world's media is singing la-la-la with its collective hands over its ears.

Oval Office onslaught II...

---

Just a follow-up really to the previous post and to the mass of red flags; “the mass of red flags already raised in the 2020 POTUS election is getting to banana republic proportions.” And to the Five More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms [The Federalist] “Surely the journalist class should be intrigued by the historic implausibility of Joe Biden’s victory. That they are not is curious, to say the least.” …yep. Sadly, expected though, in the UK we have the same problem. 

More on The American Spectator from Patrick Basham, Director of The Democracy Institute: Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzling.

"To say out-loud that you find the results of the 2020 presidential election odd is to invite derision. You must be a crank or a conspiracy theorist. Mark me down as a crank, then. I am a pollster and I find this election to be deeply puzzling. I also think that the Trump campaign is still well within its rights to contest the tabulations. Something very strange happened in America’s democracy in the early hours of Wednesday November 4 and the days that followed. It’s reasonable for a lot of Americans to want to find out exactly what."

It is an eye-opening read about many of the red flags; I have summarised, quoted, emphasised, edited slightly or paraphrased: 

President Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking re-election. Ninety-five percent of Republicans voted for him. He earned the highest share of all minority votes for a Republican since 1960. Trump increased his share of the national Hispanic vote to 35 percent. Bellwether states swung further in Trump’s direction than in 2016. Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied America’s media polls with huge wins for Trump. Only once since 1852 has a candidate lost after winning this trio (in 1960; John F. Kennedy's victory is still the subject of great suspicion). 

Biden’s black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory. He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states, which is highly unusual for the presidential victor. 

We are told that Biden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history. But he won a record low of 17 percent of counties…yet somehow outdid Obama in total votes. 

The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a ‘red wave’ in the House, where they gained many seats while winning all 27 toss-up contests. Trump’s party did not lose a single state legislature and made gains at the state level. 

Non-polling metrics: party registrations trends/ primary votes/ candidate enthusiasm/ social media followings/ broadcast and digital media ratings/ online searches/ the number of small donors/ the number of individuals betting on each candidate. These metrics have a 100% percent record predicting the winner during the modern era. Every non-polling metric forecast Trump’s re-election. For Trump… to lose, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every single one had to be wrong, and at the very same time… 

In the article there follows a list of peculiarities, which also lack ‘compelling explanations’, including: many swing states stopped counting ballots and/or continued without the observers; statistically abnormal vote counts (spikes) were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio. 

Late arriving ballots were counted/ impossible or extraordinary postal return dates (over 100k votes in PA alone in this category). The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail in ballot envelopes, historically low absentee ballot rejection rates; missing votes/ voting machine USB cards. Non-resident voters: in Georgia alone, this category alone is larger than Biden’s winning vote margin. Serious ‘chain of custody’ breakdowns. Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases… Statistical anomalies. In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. 

Yet the MSM both sides of the Atlantic play dumb, insist on calling Biden “President-elect”, erroneously, and just play on The Donald’s inability to accept defeat. This is sinsiter and evil. 

[edit 11:51] From the Federalist link above and underlining one of the anomalies in the non-polling metrics: "In the past, primary vote totals have been remarkably accurate in predicting general election winners"... "no incumbent who has received 75 percent of the total primary vote has lost re-election"... President Trump "received 94 percent of the primary vote"... ... and at the same time "set a record for most primary votes received by an incumbent", in fact that was almost DOUBLE the previous high.  

"For Biden to prevail in the general election, despite Trump’s historic support in the primaries, turns a century’s worth of prior election data on its head."

Like I said, sinister and evil and yet most of the world's media is singing la-la-la with its collective hands over its ears.

Oval Office onslaught...

---

The 'real' evidence continues to mount up (where there is this much smoke...'data takes a few moments to load') and the MSM continue to say there is none: just this week Global News (in the UK: Classic FM, Heart, LBC, Capitol Radio...) - clearly trying to outdo the laughable BBC - continue to mention 'unfounded claims' whenever the overt fraud in the POTUS 2020 electon comes up. Plus they all keep saying president-elect Biden when the vote is far from being certified: "Joe Biden is literally and legally not the President-elect. So why is the media pretending he is?" (thank you Candace)

The Epoch Times * has an intersting infographic: The 4-Year-Long Campaign Against Trump (below; click to enlarge) but it was going on throughout the campaign in 2016 too. The bank-rolling of constant protest and non-acceptance of administration appointees in key positions played out over the whole four years. 

The saga continues and I fervently hope The Donald is successful in reversing the blatant quiet coup attempt, in fact, maybe THIS Executive Order, given and signed in 2018, will come back to bite the traitors in their collective democrat donkey, ass, arse. To whit:

"I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat."

* About The Epoch Times "We don’t follow the unhealthy trend of agenda-driven journalism prevalent in today’s media environment"...

Oval Office onslaught...

---

The 'real' evidence continues to mount up (where there is this much smoke...'data takes a few moments to load') and the MSM continue to say there is none: just this week Global News (in the UK: Classic FM, Heart, LBC, Capitol Radio...) - clearly trying to outdo the laughable BBC - continue to mention 'unfounded claims' whenever the overt fraud in the POTUS 2020 electon comes up. Plus they all keep saying president-elect Biden when the vote is far from being certified: "Joe Biden is literally and legally not the President-elect. So why is the media pretending he is?" (thank you Candace)

The Epoch Times * has an intersting infographic: The 4-Year-Long Campaign Against Trump (below; click to enlarge) but it was going on throughout the campaign in 2016 too. The bank-rolling of constant protest and non-acceptance of administration appointees in key positions played out over the whole four years. 

The saga continues and I fervently hope The Donald is successful in reversing the blatant quiet coup attempt, in fact, maybe THIS Executive Order, given and signed in 2018, will come back to bite the traitors in their collective democrat donkey, ass, arse. To whit:

"I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat."

* About The Epoch Times "We don’t follow the unhealthy trend of agenda-driven journalism prevalent in today’s media environment"...

Obvious out-of overspend

---

POTUS election 2020. "Fundraising by federal candidates: In previous presidential election cycles before the 2020 election, fundraising by Democrats and Republicans remained relatively even." From The Center for Responsive Politics (Open Secrets.org)

But the main image seen above - from the article - is only one of the amazing changes: look at the out-of-state donors to state-level candidates (donations of money coming in from a different state) and the Democrats have a 75% to 25% 'lead' (currently). This is clearly the ultra wealthy living in the Clinton Archipelago* trying to buy out the fly-over states/rust belt voters. I have personal anecdotes from colleagues and family in two of those states where the overt overspend was blatant and in both cases the Democrats still lost: they hadn't banked on an overwhelming turnout for Trump. Just as well then that the small donor portion of the overall also increased:

"Candidates for Congress and the presidency raised a combined $1.8 billion from small donors in the record-breaking 2020 election cycle. That's three times the 2016 total."

...with 45 percent of donations recieved for incumbent POTUS Donald Trump's coming from said voters giving USD200 of less. This is the best small-dollar showing for a Republican presidential candidate.  

In other snippets: [The Guardian] "That is, in a year when a black woman was on a major party ticket for the first time in US history, the margin between Democrats and Republicans among black women shifted 9 percentage points in the other direction – towards Trump."

Trump saw comparable gains with Black and Hispanic men as well. What changed in the racial and gender dynamics this cycle to produce these apparently extraordinary results? The truth is, absolutely nothing. These trends have been underway for the entirety of Trump’s public life.

Also, if Biden is actually certified - no, no, I mean the VOTE - it would mean that no fewer than ten bellwether counties lost their record: [including] Valencia County in NM and Vigo County IN, whose winning streaks go back to 1952 and 1956 respectively.

[added p.m.] Also, just looking at these totals provokes so many questions.

 * I looked back when I mentioned this in 2016 and was interested to see the date: that DJT had only recently been certified...3rd week of December 2016.

Update from 23rd Nov,  5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms

Obvious out-of overspend

---

POTUS election 2020. "Fundraising by federal candidates: In previous presidential election cycles before the 2020 election, fundraising by Democrats and Republicans remained relatively even." From The Center for Responsive Politics (Open Secrets.org)

But the main image seen above - from the article - is only one of the amazing changes: look at the out-of-state donors to state-level candidates (donations of money coming in from a different state) and the Democrats have a 75% to 25% 'lead' (currently). This is clearly the ultra wealthy living in the Clinton Archipelago* trying to buy out the fly-over states/rust belt voters. I have personal anecdotes from colleagues and family in two of those states where the overt overspend was blatant and in both cases the Democrats still lost: they hadn't banked on an overwhelming turnout for Trump. Just as well then that the small donor portion of the overall also increased:

"Candidates for Congress and the presidency raised a combined $1.8 billion from small donors in the record-breaking 2020 election cycle. That's three times the 2016 total."

...with 45 percent of donations recieved for incumbent POTUS Donald Trump's coming from said voters giving USD200 of less. This is the best small-dollar showing for a Republican presidential candidate.  

In other snippets: [The Guardian] "That is, in a year when a black woman was on a major party ticket for the first time in US history, the margin between Democrats and Republicans among black women shifted 9 percentage points in the other direction – towards Trump."

Trump saw comparable gains with Black and Hispanic men as well. What changed in the racial and gender dynamics this cycle to produce these apparently extraordinary results? The truth is, absolutely nothing. These trends have been underway for the entirety of Trump’s public life.

Also, if Biden is actually certified - no, no, I mean the VOTE - it would mean that no fewer than ten bellwether counties lost their record: [including] Valencia County in NM and Vigo County IN, whose winning streaks go back to 1952 and 1956 respectively.

[added p.m.] Also, just looking at these totals provokes so many questions.

 * I looked back when I mentioned this in 2016 and was interested to see the date: that DJT had only recently been certified...3rd week of December 2016.

Update from 23rd Nov,  5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms

Observing our obstriction...

---

What a wonderful image. Seen HERE on the Twitter feed of BabelColour @StuartHumphryes 

The picture is outside Mansion House, London in 1919. The post was from Remembrance Day yesterday: "101 years ago today: 11am on Tuesday 11th November 1919, crowds in London observe the very first 2 minute silence for those killed in the Great War. The men have removed their hats out of respect for the fallen. (I originally coloured this photo for the Evening Standard in 2019)."

Observing our obstriction...

---

What a wonderful image. Seen HERE on the Twitter feed of BabelColour @StuartHumphryes 

The picture is outside Mansion House, London in 1919. The post was from Remembrance Day yesterday: "101 years ago today: 11am on Tuesday 11th November 1919, crowds in London observe the very first 2 minute silence for those killed in the Great War. The men have removed their hats out of respect for the fallen. (I originally coloured this photo for the Evening Standard in 2019)."

Obvious overreaction; observing oligophrenia...

---

Below is a handy timeline for BBC, CCN, BoJo and other presumptive (maybe even foolish) media bods and never-Trumpers everywhere. I say presumptive because they couldn't possibly KNOW this but still report Biden as Preseident elect, could they? I mean, the source of the image is CNN...? Surely that wouldn't be telling us to accept a lie? To move on and ignore multiple rampant fraud red flags?

Obvious overreaction; observing oligophrenia...

---

Below is a handy timeline for BBC, CCN, BoJo and other presumptive (maybe even foolish) media bods and never-Trumpers everywhere. I say presumptive because they couldn't possibly KNOW this but still report Biden as Preseident elect, could they? I mean, the source of the image is CNN...? Surely that wouldn't be telling us to accept a lie? To move on and ignore multiple rampant fraud red flags?

Overabundance of oriflammes...

---

The oriflamme began as monastery banner in medieval France but became an instruction to give no mercy when "displayed on the battlefield, it indicated that no quarter was to be given" [Wiki]. Bear in mind that this wasn't a royal banner but the flag of a particular church, which "in early medieval France, served as regional administrative institutions in the absence of such from a central government." [Link, Wayback machine]. It was retired centuries ago; it was flown at Crecy, Poitiers and allegedly even Agincourt so I guess us English had a very large part in that retirement hehehe. 

Of course my point here is that it is a red flag and I am certainly not one to 'keep the red flag flying' but the mass of red flags already rasied in the 2020 POTUS election is getting to banana republic proportions. The BBC helpfully provided a list of some of the signs of vote rigging HERE, from a few years ago...on their Gabon, Africa pages. Suffice to say ALL those signs are more than evident so far this week.

Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs: too many voters ("watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway. You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't", well in this election we've had a few counties over 100%. A high turnout in specific areas (yep, Milwaukee averaged 84% turnout in all areas, 80% for Biden...no, really). Then there's the large numbers of invalid votes, more votes than ballot papers issued, results that don't match (vote dumping), delay in announcing results...of course in that Gabon artice the BBC say for more than one of these issues:

"That's a good enough reason to cancel the result and arrange a re-run"...uh huh.

A better list HERE: 

• The massive turn out alone is a red flag [given COVID and mail-in I would accept this as not quite a red flag.] 
• The late night spikes that were enough to close all the Trump leads are a red flag. 
• The statistically impossible breakdown of the ratios of these vote dumps is a red flag. 
• The ratios of these dumps being far better than the percentages in the bluest of blue cities, even though the historical data does not match, red flag. 
• The ratios of these vote dumps favoring Biden more in these few battlegrounds than the ratio for the rest of the country (even the bluest of the blue) red flag. 
• Biden outperforming Obama among these few urban vote dumps, even though Trump picked up points in every demographic group in the rest of the country, red flag. 
• The poll observers being removed. Red flag. 
• The counters cheering as GOP observers are removed, red flag. 
• The fact that the dem observers outnumber the GOP observers 3 to 1, red flag (and basis of the first lawsuit filed) 
• The electioneering at the polls (on video), red flag. 
• The willful violation of the court order requiring the separation of ballots by type, red flag.
  USPS whistleblower reporting to the Inspector General that today they were ordered to backdate ballots to yesterday, red flag. 
• The video of 2 AM deliveries of what appear to be boxes of ballots with no chain of custody or other observers right before the late night miracle spikes, red flag.
  
   

"Any of those things would be enough to trigger an audit in the normal world."...uh huh.

And I haven't even got onto the computer "glitches", all of which - as you may have guessed -  "go in the same direction". And then you have literal votedumping, not like the 'votedumping' link above where tranches of ballots turn up, just at the right time just the right amount and all for Biden...no, there is also LITERAL vote dumping.

What a clusterfuck, even deepest darkest Africa would be embarrassed by this...and all week the left-wing media (yep, that means most of the MSM) have been saying "Biden stopped short of declaring and outright win"...WTF? ...he CAN'T, he hasn't won yet so WHY say this? They are trying to create - in line with the Democrat party's efforts - the impression the creepy Joe is the honest winner and when  Trump - rightly - gets legal processes going to fight the multiple, widespread, major irregularities - is painted as the villain. Even the pictures of Biden in all the print media are now airbrushed, touched images trying to make him look presidential (he is not).  They are ALL complicit. If Biden wins this election has been stolen. Watered down Brexit and Trump removed in a coordinated coup, the WuHuFlu ...the globalists are fighting back with everything.

A fair ongoing summary of most of the above and more: Democrats Are Trying To Steal the US Presidential Election [*] on Freepress.ie

"Four years of the now debunked Russiagate hoax and nancy-pelosi’s
[sic] impeachment witch-hunts have polarised the United states, via the media.
This constant repetitive demonisation of a man who has done incredible
good for the United states has achieved one very notable victory: it has
summoned a willing army of accomplices to participate in massive
election fraud... ...They
have been condition to despise this man completely by the utterly biased
mainstream media... ...Good people who have been conditioned to hate Donald Trump so much, they
will go so far to lose their senses and aid in election fraud"

Hear hear!

[*] aided and abetted by an bias, corrupt media.

Overabundance of oriflammes...

---

The oriflamme began as monastery banner in medieval France but became an instruction to give no mercy when "displayed on the battlefield, it indicated that no quarter was to be given" [Wiki]. Bear in mind that this wasn't a royal banner but the flag of a particular church, which "in early medieval France, served as regional administrative institutions in the absence of such from a central government." [Link, Wayback machine]. It was retired centuries ago; it was flown at Crecy, Poitiers and allegedly even Agincourt so I guess us English had a very large part in that retirement hehehe. 

Of course my point here is that it is a red flag and I am certainly not one to 'keep the red flag flying' but the mass of red flags already rasied in the 2020 POTUS election is getting to banana republic proportions. The BBC helpfully provided a list of some of the signs of vote rigging HERE, from a few years ago...on their Gabon, Africa pages. Suffice to say ALL those signs are more than evident so far this week. Vote rigging: How to spot the tell-tale signs: too many voters ("watch the turnout figures ‒ they can be a big giveaway. You never get a 98% or 99% turnout in an honest election. You just don't", well in this election we've had a few counties over 100%. A high turnout in specific areas (yep, Milwaukee averaged 84% turnout in all areas, 80% for Biden...no, really). Then there's the large numbers of invalid votes, more votes than ballot papers issued, results that don't match (vote dumping), delay in announcing results...of course in that Gabon artice the BBC say for more than one of these issues:

"That's a good enough reason to cancel the result and arrange a re-run"...uh huh.

A better list HERE: 

• The massive turn out alone is a red flag [given COVID and mail-in I would accept this as not quite a red flag.] 
• The late night spikes that were enough to close all the Trump leads are a red flag. 
• The statistically impossible breakdown of the ratios of these vote dumps is a red flag. 
• The ratios of these dumps being far better than the percentages in the bluest of blue cities, even though the historical data does not match, red flag. 
• The ratios of these vote dumps favoring Biden more in these few battlegrounds than the ratio for the rest of the country (even the bluest of the blue) red flag. 
• Biden outperforming Obama among these few urban vote dumps, even though Trump picked up points in every demographic group in the rest of the country, red flag. 
• The poll observers being removed. Red flag. 
• The counters cheering as GOP observers are removed, red flag. 
• The fact that the dem observers outnumber the GOP observers 3 to 1, red flag (and basis of the first lawsuit filed) 
• The electioneering at the polls (on video), red flag. 
• The willful violation of the court order requiring the separation of ballots by type, red flag. USPS whistleblower reporting to the Inspector General that today they were ordered to backdate ballots to yesterday, red flag. 
• The video of 2 AM deliveries of what appear to be boxes of ballots with no chain of custody or other observers right before the late night miracle spikes, red flag.  

"Any of those things would be enough to trigger an audit in the normal world."...uh huh.

And I haven't even got onto the computer "glitches", all of which - as you may have guessed -  "go in the same direction". And then you have literal votedumping, not like the 'votedumping' link above where tranches of ballots turn up, just at the right time just the right amount and all for Biden...no, there is also LITERAL vote dumping.

What a clusterfuck, even deepest darkest Africa would be embarrassed by this...and all week the left-wing media (yep, that means most of the MSM) have been saying "Biden stopped short of declaring and outright win"...WTF? ...he CAN'T, he hasn't won yet so WHY say this? They are trying to create - in line with the Democrat party's efforts - the impression the creepy Joe is the honest winner and when  Trump - rightly - gets legal processes going to fight the multiple, widespread, major irregularities - is painted as the villain. Even the pictures of Biden in all the print media are now airbrushed, touched images trying to make him look presidential (he is not).  They are ALL complicit. If Biden wins this election has been stolen. Watered down Brexit and Trump removed in a coordinated coup, the WuHuFlu ...the globalists are fighting back with everything.

A fair ongoing summary of most of the above and more: Democrats Are Trying To Steal the US Presidential Election [*] on Freepress.ie

"Four years of the now debunked Russiagate hoax and nancy-pelosi’s [sic] impeachment witch-hunts have polarised the United states, via the media. This constant repetitive demonisation of a man who has done incredible good for the United states has achieved one very notable victory: it has summoned a willing army of accomplices to participate in massive election fraud... ...They have been condition to despise this man completely by the utterly biased mainstream media... ...Good people who have been conditioned to hate Donald Trump so much, they will go so far to lose their senses and aid in election fraud"

Hear hear!

[*] aided and abetted by an bias, corrupt media.