Outing obsequious oriental obedientiaries...

---

This from the USA but one presumes we have the same problem in the UK and Europe:

"Professors around America have been caught selling secret research to the Chinese Communist Regime. The national media won't cover it..."

And there are more than a few! See Cabot Phillip's Twitter feed for details or easier to read in Thread Reader HERE.



In the UK our vile media is turning into the what the USA is having to put up with, think BBC = CNN and you won't be far wrong except in the UK the public are FORCED to pay for the biased BBC. Here we currently have the Remainer-run Dominic Cummings witchhunt where the bubble and blob are really freaking out: over there, Cabot writes

"We had almost zero evidence of foreign interference in our elections, and half the country freaked out. Now, we have endless evidence of foreign interference on our campuses, and no one is batting an eye."

He adds that "People on campus are afraid to question China's influence efforts for fear of being labeled xenophobic or racist." Sure, but they will also be concerned they'll lose their funding: think of similar to the Arabian Islamic paid influence in many UK and European Universties, but x 10.

Outing obsequious oriental obedientiaries...

---

This from the USA but one presumes we have the same problem in the UK and Europe:

"Professors around America have been caught selling secret research to the Chinese Communist Regime. The national media won't cover it..."

And there are more than a few! See Cabot Phillip's Twitter feed for details or easier to read in Thread Reader HERE.

In the UK our vile media is turning into the what the USA is having to put up with, think BBC = CNN and you won't be far wrong except in the UK the public are FORCED to pay for the biased BBC. Here we currently have the Remainer-run Dominic Cummings witchhunt where the bubble and blob are really freaking out: over there, Cabot writes

"We had almost zero evidence of foreign interference in our elections, and half the country freaked out. Now, we have endless evidence of foreign interference on our campuses, and no one is batting an eye."

He adds that "People on campus are afraid to question China's influence efforts for fear of being labeled xenophobic or racist." Sure, but they will also be concerned they'll lose their funding: think of similar to the Arabian Islamic paid influence in many UK and European Universties, but x 10.

Obvious obscurantism or oligomania...

---

Hah! The smoking gun, the proof they've promised...and promised...and...nope...Zzzzz. "Thirteen Russians have been charged with interfering in the US 2016 election, in a major development in the FBI investigation". Yea, major development. Take that Trump; take that Conservatives; take that Righties, take that Brexit lovers! Below are screenshots from the BBC Home page and their main News page and their page of news on this story...already the bubble was popped, hours ago...but they must keep on: Nelly the elephant [in the room] packed her trunk and said goodbye to the [media] circus - Trump Trump Trump - but the BBC, CNN et al are just so fucking biased and getting more ridiculous by the day. Jon Sopel and Anthony Zurcher are beyond pathetic. Two lines you will NOT see anywhere in the BBC report:

"There’s no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge."...

"There is no allegation in the indictment of any effect on the outcome of the election"

What the BBC DO report: "He also appeared to acknowledge Russian election meddling - something which he has in the past cast doubt on despite US intelligence agency assessments." They are so fucking biased that it must be intentional, editorial policy. So, you think there's anything on or against Trump? You think there's anything that hasn't gone on in every election in most countries for many decades, except for the modern technologies aspects obviously? [And certainly BY the USA in dozens of countries]. You think? Sorry, not so. This is nothing; this is ONLY about using social media to influence people.This isn't a nothing burger, it's not even the screwed-up paper wrapper of a nothing burger.




The next Trump bashing is already in the pipeline, although I'm sure it'll be the Bishops being bashed if you know, what I mean [adult content].

Obvious obscurantism or oligomania...

---

Hah! The smoking gun, the proof they've promised...and promised...and...nope...Zzzzz. "Thirteen Russians have been charged with interfering in the US 2016 election, in a major development in the FBI investigation". Yea, major development. Take that Trump; take that Conservatives; take that Righties, take that Brexit lovers! Below are screenshots from the BBC Home page and their main News page and their page of news on this story...already the bubble was popped, hours ago...but they must keep on: Nelly the elephant [in the room] packed her trunk and said goodbye to the [media] circus - Trump Trump Trump - but the BBC, CNN et al are just so fucking biased and getting more ridiculous by the day. Jon Sopel and Anthony Zurcher are beyond pathetic. Two lines you will NOT see anywhere in the BBC report:

"There’s no allegation in this indictment that any American had any knowledge."...
"There is no allegation in the indictment of any effect on the outcome of the election"

What the BBC DO report: "He also appeared to acknowledge Russian election meddling - something which he has in the past cast doubt on despite US intelligence agency assessments." They are so fucking biased that it must be intentional, editorial policy. So, you think there's anything on or against Trump? You think there's anything that hasn't gone on in every election in most countries for many decades, except for the modern technologies aspects obviously? [And certainly BY the USA in dozens of countries]. You think? Sorry, not so. This is nothing; this is ONLY about using social media to influence people.This isn't a nothing burger, it's not even the screwed-up paper wrapper of a nothing burger.

The next Trump bashing is already in the pipeline, although I'm sure it'll be the Bishops being bashed if you know, what I mean [adult content].

Ossoff off...

---

Karen Handel has done an amazing thing: in a race that was overly expensive and received more than usual national attention (mainly because it was seen as a possible sign of a turning of the tide in the popularity of Donald Trump's presidency) she not only beat the Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff by a Brexitesque margin but in doing so became the first Republican woman to be elected to U.S. Congress from Georgia. And she isn't a shrinking violet RINO, oh no: she is against a minimum wage; supports The Donald's decision to leave the Paris Climate Agreement; opposes abortion; opposes same-sex marriage AND same-sex civil partnerships; she opposes gay adoption of children and totally against any amnesty for illegal immigrants. But most of all...she gave us the wonderful faces of the CNN staff (CNN is based in Atlanta for you UK folk who may not know). So funny.

Ossoff off...

---

Karen Handel has done an amazing thing: in a race that was overly expensive and received more than usual national attention (mainly because it was seen as a possible sign of a turning of the tide in the popularity of Donald Trump's presidency) she not only beat the Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff by a Brexitesque margin but in doing so became the first Republican woman to be elected to U.S. Congress from Georgia. And she isn't a shrinking violet RINO, oh no: she is against a minimum wage; supports The Donald's decision to leave the Paris Climate Agreement; opposes abortion; opposes same-sex marriage AND same-sex civil partnerships; she opposes gay adoption of children and totally against any amnesty for illegal immigrants. But most of all...she gave us the wonderful faces of the CNN staff (CNN is based in Atlanta for you UK folk who may not know). So funny.

Open-mindedness over oligophrenia...

---

Don't be an April Fool: Question Everything. There is not much better advice for anyone these days: the more we think we know the less we probably really do know: "many Westerners feel that, without this [24 hour news] constant input, they would be woefully uninformed", so writes Jeff Thomas at International Man:

"The average news programme features a commentator who provides 'the news,' or at least that portion of events that the network deems worthy to be presented. In addition, it is presented from the political slant of the controllers of the network. But we are reassured that the reporting is 'balanced,' in a portion of the programme that features a panel of 'experts.'"

No prizes for guessing who I'm thinking of but of course there are more. Especially true is the chapter Evolution of Indoctrination:  "In bygone eras, the kings of old would tell their minions what to believe... 

...Today, a far more effective method exists...In a democracy, there is always an "A" and a "B." This illusion of choice is infinitely more effective in helping the populace to believe that they have been able to choose their leaders and their points of view."...

"To consider that the event that is being discussed may not only be being falsely reported, but that the message being provided by the pundits may be consciously planned for our consumption."

Question Everything...

Open-mindedness over oligophrenia...

---

Don't be an April Fool: Question Everything. There is not much better advice for anyone these days: the more we think we know the less we probably really do know: "many Westerners feel that, without this [24 hour news] constant input, they would be woefully uninformed", so writes Jeff Thomas at International Man:

"The average news programme features a commentator who provides 'the news,' or at least that portion of events that the network deems worthy to be presented. In addition, it is presented from the political slant of the controllers of the network. But we are reassured that the reporting is 'balanced,' in a portion of the programme that features a panel of 'experts.'"

No prizes for guessing who I'm thinking of but of course there are more. Especially true is the chapter Evolution of Indoctrination:  "In bygone eras, the kings of old would tell their minions what to believe... 
...Today, a far more effective method exists...In a democracy, there is always an "A" and a "B." This illusion of choice is infinitely more effective in helping the populace to believe that they have been able to choose their leaders and their points of view."...

"To consider that the event that is being discussed may not only be being falsely reported, but that the message being provided by the pundits may be consciously planned for our consumption."

Question Everything...