Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta law. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta law. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 8 de junio de 2020

Obmutescent oblivion, omphaloskepsis over ochlocracy...




The final phase begins. It has been coming - and orchestrated - for decades but now - really - people need to wake up.







"The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all."
― G.K. Chesterton


Obmutescent oblivion, omphaloskepsis over ochlocracy...


The final phase begins. It has been coming - and orchestrated - for decades but now - really - people need to wake up.


"The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all." ― G.K. Chesterton

domingo, 24 de febrero de 2019

Outstanding opportunities outweigh obedientiary overburdening III...




Brexit: 33 days to go [countdown].



The case, as per several weeks ago and despite a plethora of annoying complicated votes, is still "an object lesson in elite betrayal": "Leaving without a deal to trade under WTO rules is a real possibility because of both the fast approaching leave date and the inability of the House of Commons to come up with any plan which can command a majority. Moreover, significant numbers of leave MPs have embraced the idea as being the best route out of the EU for of the UK." [England calling]



I also agree entirely with Emily Barley (Chairman of Conservatives for Liberty and writing on Brexit Central this weekend)


"It’s time for those of us who campaigned and voted to leave the EU to speak up, loud and clear, for the kind of future we want for our country. Not just on trade, borders and immigration, but in terms of the great British traditions we ought to restore. When the UK finally exits the EU, we should renew our commitment to civil liberties."




De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae

Partly on the same theme: 'Escaping Illiberal Values', [LINK] "It’s no secret the EU views concepts such as decentralization with disapproval. For 'progressive' institutions like the EU, classical liberal concepts of limited government and smaller political units
checking bigger units are toxic roadblocks that keep it from realizing its universalist vision. The British Isles, on the other hand, have historically been the cradle for classically liberal practices such as federalism, free speech, and property rights.
" (Jose Niño, published on the Mises Wire, Mises Institute)








This was one of my main reasons for voting Leave too: not just the trade opportunities or freedom/regaining sovereignty etc., but to escape the clutches of the quagmire pull of what Napoleon believed his greatest achievement ("My real glory is not the forty battles I won, for Waterloo's defeat will destroy the memory of as many victories... What nothing will destroy, what will live forever, is my Civil Code."



There are some similarities between English Common Law and the Napoleonic Code but many differences; you can see the logic in the original idea to codify rules and 'equalise' the Law but 'mission creep' should have been foreseen and with today's politicians such complete control can only lead to one outcome: sort of a bastardised cross between another Reich and another Soviet Union, and/or the one they say they've been trying to avoid for decades: war. 


Outstanding opportunities outweigh obedientiary overburdening III...


Brexit: 33 days to go [countdown].

The case, as per several weeks ago and despite a plethora of annoying complicated votes, is still "an object lesson in elite betrayal": "Leaving without a deal to trade under WTO rules is a real possibility because of both the fast approaching leave date and the inability of the House of Commons to come up with any plan which can command a majority. Moreover, significant numbers of leave MPs have embraced the idea as being the best route out of the EU for of the UK." [England calling]

I also agree entirely with Emily Barley (Chairman of Conservatives for Liberty and writing on Brexit Central this weekend)
"It’s time for those of us who campaigned and voted to leave the EU to speak up, loud and clear, for the kind of future we want for our country. Not just on trade, borders and immigration, but in terms of the great British traditions we ought to restore. When the UK finally exits the EU, we should renew our commitment to civil liberties."
De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae
Partly on the same theme: 'Escaping Illiberal Values', [LINK] "It’s no secret the EU views concepts such as decentralization with disapproval. For 'progressive' institutions like the EU, classical liberal concepts of limited government and smaller political units checking bigger units are toxic roadblocks that keep it from realizing its universalist vision. The British Isles, on the other hand, have historically been the cradle for classically liberal practices such as federalism, free speech, and property rights." (Jose Niño, published on the Mises Wire, Mises Institute)

This was one of my main reasons for voting Leave too: not just the trade opportunities or freedom/regaining sovereignty etc., but to escape the clutches of the quagmire pull of what Napoleon believed his greatest achievement ("My real glory is not the forty battles I won, for Waterloo's defeat will destroy the memory of as many victories... What nothing will destroy, what will live forever, is my Civil Code."

There are some similarities between English Common Law and the Napoleonic Code but many differences; you can see the logic in the original idea to codify rules and 'equalise' the Law but 'mission creep' should have been foreseen and with today's politicians such complete control can only lead to one outcome: sort of a bastardised cross between another Reich and another Soviet Union, and/or the one they say they've been trying to avoid for decades: war. 

jueves, 31 de octubre de 2013

Open objectors...






"As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs" or so many of the Del-Boy preachers said. Many objected; one of those wrote ninety five statements that quickly became the first media revolution; which led to a ration of invertebrates [or something] permitting anyone to kill said objector without legal consequence. The ensuing schism was massive and continues to this day. "What is Ows on about?" you cry! Reading Cranmer today would give you a massive clue. You certainly don't have to be a Christian - practising or not - to feel serious concern at how "Politicians and lawyers have conspired to nullify our ancient and hard-won liberties: we are no longer free."

Open objectors...


"As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs" or so many of the Del-Boy preachers said. Many objected; one of those wrote ninety five statements that quickly became the first media revolution; which led to a ration of invertebrates [or something] permitting anyone to kill said objector without legal consequence. The ensuing schism was massive and continues to this day. "What is Ows on about?" you cry! Reading Cranmer today would give you a massive clue. You certainly don't have to be a Christian - practising or not - to feel serious concern at how "Politicians and lawyers have conspired to nullify our ancient and hard-won liberties: we are no longer free."

domingo, 13 de enero de 2013

Obama's oncoming onslaught...






...could be over before it's begun. Talking of course about the possibility of gun control laws. Early this year (OK, it's less than 2 weeks old!) Godfather Politics reminded readers that "Most people, including politicians fail to realize that the ultimate legal authorities in the land are the county sheriffs". Now things have gone even further with the State of Wyoming introducing legislation to ban the federal government from enforcing their own bans on some weapons [hat-tip Weasel Zippers]. This is a call to 'take the Second Amendment seriously' and it's all moot at present because no such new ban/law has happened yet...but if Wyoming’s legislature can convince the courts that federal gun regulations are themselves unconstitutional it could stymie the current supremacy clause, 'which holds that enforceable federal laws trump state laws when they conflict.' Now, as we know, all this new hoohah stems directly from the latest shooting tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School and the rumours/conspiracy theories about that, which started almost immediately after the massacre, are getting weirder and louder [hat-tip Captain Ranty] with - amongst other things - condolence/donate pages being set up in the names of the victims BEFORE the incident!!!???

Obama's oncoming onslaught...


...could be over before it's begun. Talking of course about the possibility of gun control laws. Early this year (OK, it's less than 2 weeks old!) Godfather Politics reminded readers that "Most people, including politicians fail to realize that the ultimate legal authorities in the land are the county sheriffs". Now things have gone even further with the State of Wyoming introducing legislation to ban the federal government from enforcing their own bans on some weapons [hat-tip Weasel Zippers]. This is a call to 'take the Second Amendment seriously' and it's all moot at present because no such new ban/law has happened yet...but if Wyoming’s legislature can convince the courts that federal gun regulations are themselves unconstitutional it could stymie the current supremacy clause, 'which holds that enforceable federal laws trump state laws when they conflict.' Now, as we know, all this new hoohah stems directly from the latest shooting tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School and the rumours/conspiracy theories about that, which started almost immediately after the massacre, are getting weirder and louder [hat-tip Captain Ranty] with - amongst other things - condolence/donate pages being set up in the names of the victims BEFORE the incident!!!???

domingo, 16 de diciembre de 2012

Obscene opportunism...




Apparently "there's nothing else Obama can do" but label the National Rifle Association as "the enablers of mass murderers"; so said Democrat Representative Jerry Nadler** (he's not the only Democrat exploiting this tragedy). As more details emerge of the unbelievably sad events in Newtown, Connecticut (and we hear that 'all of the children killed by the gunman during a massacre at a Connecticut elementary school were shot multiple times') such obscene political opportunism is sickening.



Update: **nuff said.




Update 2: National Rifle Association President Wayne LaPierre, in a Dec. 3 interview on CNN predicted a gun battle was brewing for the next Congress, which starts in January. "I think it is going to come hard, I think it is going to come fast, and I think it is going to come soon"...you can bet it is now. Maybe that was a motive? Reading Tyler's take on things, maybe this was...

Obscene opportunism...


Apparently "there's nothing else Obama can do" but label the National Rifle Association as "the enablers of mass murderers"; so said Democrat Representative Jerry Nadler** (he's not the only Democrat exploiting this tragedy). As more details emerge of the unbelievably sad events in Newtown, Connecticut (and we hear that 'all of the children killed by the gunman during a massacre at a Connecticut elementary school were shot multiple times') such obscene political opportunism is sickening.

Update: **nuff said.

Update 2: National Rifle Association President Wayne LaPierre, in a Dec. 3 interview on CNN predicted a gun battle was brewing for the next Congress, which starts in January. "I think it is going to come hard, I think it is going to come fast, and I think it is going to come soon"...you can bet it is now. Maybe that was a motive? Reading Tyler's take on things, maybe this was...

domingo, 11 de marzo de 2012

Officers out of our orbit?...






"Is this the final recognition that the Police are no longer considered ‘part of society’?" writes Anna Raccoon. Relating to the imminent release of Magdi Elgizouli (he was diagnosed as having a pathological hatred of the police): "Knifeman with a hatred of police is 'safe to be freed'... but only to an area where there aren't too many officers on the beat" says the Daily Mail; ludicrous if even part true - and contrary to "19th Century Peelian traditions" - it is seemingly testament to the fact that a Police Officer is no longer considered part of the public!



However, "Notwithstanding sensationalist headlines, legitimate questions are being asked this morning about whether the decision to release is correct..." wrote MentalHealthCop yesterday; Michael also has a lot more, especially about how the decision to release would have been taken and he also hopes the checks and balances have worked, because, if the release goes wrong - or Elgizouli get in trouble again - "guess who is going to get called?".



Bookmark and Share

Officers out of our orbit?...


"Is this the final recognition that the Police are no longer considered ‘part of society’?" writes Anna Raccoon. Relating to the imminent release of Magdi Elgizouli (he was diagnosed as having a pathological hatred of the police): "Knifeman with a hatred of police is 'safe to be freed'... but only to an area where there aren't too many officers on the beat" says the Daily Mail; ludicrous if even part true - and contrary to "19th Century Peelian traditions" - it is seemingly testament to the fact that a Police Officer is no longer considered part of the public!

However, "Notwithstanding sensationalist headlines, legitimate questions are being asked this morning about whether the decision to release is correct..." wrote MentalHealthCop yesterday; Michael also has a lot more, especially about how the decision to release would have been taken and he also hopes the checks and balances have worked, because, if the release goes wrong - or Elgizouli get in trouble again - "guess who is going to get called?".

Bookmark and Share

jueves, 2 de febrero de 2012

Ominous obrogation...




Just to highlight how sinister the EU and UK laws have become we now have Krusty the cancerous clown following suit! Laws designed in all innocence (ahem!) to counter money laundering, organized crime and terrorist financing they are so vague and open as put everyone under suspicion. In this case MUD couldn't prevent the muddying of the waters. [typos edited Friday p.m.]



Bookmark and Share

Ominous obrogation...


Just to highlight how sinister the EU and UK laws have become we now have Krusty the cancerous clown following suit! Laws designed in all innocence (ahem!) to counter money laundering, organized crime and terrorist financing they are so vague and open as put everyone under suspicion. In this case MUD couldn't prevent the muddying of the waters. [typos edited Friday p.m.]

Bookmark and Share