miércoles, 31 de octubre de 2012

OptaJoe offering...







OptaJoe gives the stat: unbelievable and not a bad evening's entertainment...WTF! If you left at 4-0 or 4-1 (and many of you did) then I hope you are really cheesed off right now.

OptaJoe offering...


OptaJoe gives the stat: unbelievable and not a bad evening's entertainment...WTF! If you left at 4-0 or 4-1 (and many of you did) then I hope you are really cheesed off right now.

martes, 30 de octubre de 2012

Orarian orison...






Hurricane Sandy


wind cartoon
A short prayer for coastal dwellers wouldn't go amiss; it is not my intention to make fun of all the deaths (at least 102 people have been confirmed killed so far throughout the USA and Caribbean) or the multi-billion cost of the damage or the millions without power that Hurricane Sandy is doing as it passes on its way, but the image left (click for Wiki page) does look like our primary school attempts to draw wind blowing.



Orarian orison...


Hurricane Sandy
wind cartoon
A short prayer for coastal dwellers wouldn't go amiss; it is not my intention to make fun of all the deaths (at least 102 people have been confirmed killed so far throughout the USA and Caribbean) or the multi-billion cost of the damage or the millions without power that Hurricane Sandy is doing as it passes on its way, but the image left (click for Wiki page) does look like our primary school attempts to draw wind blowing.

lunes, 29 de octubre de 2012

Oncoming ochlesis...




Not quite but in one respect the 'science' is settled; there need be no more discussion: "The immigration lobby are getting desperately short of arguments to set against the huge costs of mass immigration"... "Immigration caps don’t hamper the economic recovery. Why pretend otherwise?" [Link]

Oncoming ochlesis...


Not quite but in one respect the 'science' is settled; there need be no more discussion: "The immigration lobby are getting desperately short of arguments to set against the huge costs of mass immigration"... "Immigration caps don’t hamper the economic recovery. Why pretend otherwise?" [Link]

viernes, 26 de octubre de 2012

Osama, Obama, O'Hara...




"Thanks to the magic of editing, President Obama will have a starring role in a television drama about one of his biggest accomplishments — the killing of Osama bin Laden..." [Link].  Set for a prime-time début on Nov. 4...two days before the election for POTUS. All the efforts to save Obama is shaping up to be worse than the Venezuelan shenanigans.

Osama, Obama, O'Hara...


"Thanks to the magic of editing, President Obama will have a starring role in a television drama about one of his biggest accomplishments — the killing of Osama bin Laden..." [Link].  Set for a prime-time début on Nov. 4...two days before the election for POTUS. All the efforts to save Obama is shaping up to be worse than the Venezuelan shenanigans.

Obvious opposition...




"Only now, long after the election, do we begin to realise how clever Gordon Brown really was. After the crash, in his last two years in office, he started preparing for a new kind of Opposition. Labour might be turfed out of government, but it could carry on the fight through charities, quangos and think tanks. At one stage, Brown had a team in Downing Street devoted to appointments in public bodies, carefully building what would become a kind of government-in-exile." [Link]



Erm... "only now" Fraser? I've been screaming this - along with other 'right wing loonies' - for years (because it began long before Brown, it went hand in hand with the Blairite "reforms" of the Civil Service: something Norman mentions, along with -off topic- a perfect description of what has happened to the BBC). Please read the whole of Fraser's article though, it will explain a lot if you hadn't already twigged.

Obvious opposition...


"Only now, long after the election, do we begin to realise how clever Gordon Brown really was. After the crash, in his last two years in office, he started preparing for a new kind of Opposition. Labour might be turfed out of government, but it could carry on the fight through charities, quangos and think tanks. At one stage, Brown had a team in Downing Street devoted to appointments in public bodies, carefully building what would become a kind of government-in-exile." [Link]

Erm... "only now" Fraser? I've been screaming this - along with other 'right wing loonies' - for years (because it began long before Brown, it went hand in hand with the Blairite "reforms" of the Civil Service: something Norman mentions, along with -off topic- a perfect description of what has happened to the BBC). Please read the whole of Fraser's article though, it will explain a lot if you hadn't already twigged.

jueves, 25 de octubre de 2012

OMG IV...






This is just so wrong: what do the Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Congo, Chad and the Central African Republic have in common? All African countries best to avoid? Good guess but not the answer. What about Gabon, Benin, Niger, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea and Guinea-Bissau? Same! In fact most of them are neighbours in West Africa. Not Eritrea though, that's East Africa. OK, let's add a neighbour for that to the list too: Djibouti. Still no idea? Add Angola and Zimbabwe. Come on, it has to be something to do with Africa, right? No, add Haiti. Well I'll tell you: all 15 of the above mentioned countries are in the bottom 16 of the 10th edition of the World Bank's annual report Doing Business (a publication that now covers 11 indicator sets and 185 economies [full report] (PDF). The common factor of the five countries I first mentioned are the only ones that were below Venezuela. OK, the image gave it away! But VENEZUELA (!!) the country with the world's largest estimated oil reserves, so great in fact that they are nearly 25% of OPEC's entire world crude oil reserves (yes, really!).



The Doing Business report "analyzes regulations that apply to an economy’s businesses during their life cycle, including start-up and operations, trading across borders, paying taxes, and protecting investors. The aggregate ease of doing business rankings are based on 10 indicators and cover 185 economies. Doing Business does not measure all aspects of the business environment that matter to firms and investors.Attribution: World Bank. 2013. Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9615-5.

OMG IV...


This is just so wrong: what do the Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Congo, Chad and the Central African Republic have in common? All African countries best to avoid? Good guess but not the answer. What about Gabon, Benin, Niger, Côte d’Ivoire, Guinea and Guinea-Bissau? Same! In fact most of them are neighbours in West Africa. Not Eritrea though, that's East Africa. OK, let's add a neighbour for that to the list too: Djibouti. Still no idea? Add Angola and Zimbabwe. Come on, it has to be something to do with Africa, right? No, add Haiti. Well I'll tell you: all 15 of the above mentioned countries are in the bottom 16 of the 10th edition of the World Bank's annual report Doing Business (a publication that now covers 11 indicator sets and 185 economies [full report] (PDF). The common factor of the five countries I first mentioned are the only ones that were below Venezuela. OK, the image gave it away! But VENEZUELA (!!) the country with the world's largest estimated oil reserves, so great in fact that they are nearly 25% of OPEC's entire world crude oil reserves (yes, really!).

The Doing Business report "analyzes regulations that apply to an economy’s businesses during their life cycle, including start-up and operations, trading across borders, paying taxes, and protecting investors. The aggregate ease of doing business rankings are based on 10 indicators and cover 185 economies. Doing Business does not measure all aspects of the business environment that matter to firms and investors.Attribution: World Bank. 2013. Doing Business 2013: Smarter Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9615-5.

Outing Obama...




You may flinch at the fact that it is Glenn Beck (personally I like the guy!) but if even a tenth of what he is saying is anywhere near the truth (and it seems to be leaking out to the wider world bit by bit: Reuters) then Obama should be toast: no wonder the US MSM haven't been touching Bengahzigate with a bargepole (although anyone who is even a tiny bit interested can see their deflection to draw attention away from the obvious lies about it being due to demonstrations in reaction to that Islam video). As I say, if even a tenth of this is true it will make Watergate look like a white lie about who ate the last lollipop. And similarly here in the UK, James Delingpole writes about the blatant lies and non reporting: "Here's one thing we can be sure of about the Benghazi affair: almost everything we've been told since by the mainstream media is a lie, invariably one designed to shore up the creaky and desperate Obama administration."

Outing Obama...


You may flinch at the fact that it is Glenn Beck (personally I like the guy!) but if even a tenth of what he is saying is anywhere near the truth (and it seems to be leaking out to the wider world bit by bit: Reuters) then Obama should be toast: no wonder the US MSM haven't been touching Bengahzigate with a bargepole (although anyone who is even a tiny bit interested can see their deflection to draw attention away from the obvious lies about it being due to demonstrations in reaction to that Islam video). As I say, if even a tenth of this is true it will make Watergate look like a white lie about who ate the last lollipop. And similarly here in the UK, James Delingpole writes about the blatant lies and non reporting: "Here's one thing we can be sure of about the Benghazi affair: almost everything we've been told since by the mainstream media is a lie, invariably one designed to shore up the creaky and desperate Obama administration."

lunes, 22 de octubre de 2012

Outrage outlaws...




[Edited: 'dead' image/video removed]

Well said Rowan! And well said Cranmer (hat-tipped) who writes "Criminal law rightly protects individuals against unjust discrimination, incitement and violence. But it is unacceptable that it has moved into areas of annoyance, disturbance and inconvenience. The law should punish violence or the threat of violence; it should not be used to protect us from having our feelings hurt, especially since people may manifestly choose of their own volition to be offended."



Ahhhh (sighs), who can forget Constable Savage; another was the vicar on gay Christians, "God hates poofs"...those and other favourites HERE. The Conservative party Conference: "Like we understand young criminals, another very emotive issue. This party feels that we've been just a little too soft on these... bastards. ...If [electric shock treatment] doesn't work? Then of course we will be more than prepared to revert to old liberal wishy-washy socialist Nigger-loving Red left-wing homosexual commie ways of the recent past. But please, let's have a chance!"

Outrage outlaws...


[Edited: 'dead' image/video removed] Well said Rowan! And well said Cranmer (hat-tipped) who writes "Criminal law rightly protects individuals against unjust discrimination, incitement and violence. But it is unacceptable that it has moved into areas of annoyance, disturbance and inconvenience. The law should punish violence or the threat of violence; it should not be used to protect us from having our feelings hurt, especially since people may manifestly choose of their own volition to be offended."

Ahhhh (sighs), who can forget Constable Savage; another was the vicar on gay Christians, "God hates poofs"...those and other favourites HERE. The Conservative party Conference: "Like we understand young criminals, another very emotive issue. This party feels that we've been just a little too soft on these... bastards. ...If [electric shock treatment] doesn't work? Then of course we will be more than prepared to revert to old liberal wishy-washy socialist Nigger-loving Red left-wing homosexual commie ways of the recent past. But please, let's have a chance!"

Outrage outlaws...


Well said Rowan! And well said Cranmer (hat-tipped) who writes "Criminal law rightly protects individuals against unjust discrimination, incitement and violence. But it is unacceptable that it has moved into areas of annoyance, disturbance and inconvenience. The law should punish violence or the threat of violence; it should not be used to protect us from having our feelings hurt, especially since people may manifestly choose of their own volition to be offended."

Ahhhh (sighs), who can forget Constable Savage; another was the vicar on gay Christians, "God hates poofs"...those and other favourites HERE. The Conservative party Conference: "Like we understand young criminals, another very emotive issue. This party feels that we've been just a little too soft on these... bastards. ...If [electric shock treatment] doesn't work? Then of course we will be more than prepared to revert to old liberal wishy-washy socialist Nigger-loving Red left-wing homosexual commie ways of the recent past. But please, let's have a chance!"

domingo, 21 de octubre de 2012

Osbornegate...






Hardly a surprise really what with shoulder-chips and a heightened sense of entitlement (am I being too hard on them?). Just as Plebgate (Gategate) fades we have another media feeding frenzy but hopefully slapped down in good time. Another silly Twitter frenzy about George Osborne is still being widely reported despite being shown to be not only a storm in a teacup but also complete pants as the Chancellor's Office and Virgin Rail concurring statements have shown.




Hat-tip (and image) Conservative Home. Gravy Train numbers: Sunday Telegraph.

Osbornegate...


Hardly a surprise really what with shoulder-chips and a heightened sense of entitlement (am I being too hard on them?). Just as Plebgate (Gategate) fades we have another media feeding frenzy but hopefully slapped down in good time. Another silly Twitter frenzy about George Osborne is still being widely reported despite being shown to be not only a storm in a teacup but also complete pants as the Chancellor's Office and Virgin Rail concurring statements have shown.

Hat-tip (and image) Conservative Home. Gravy Train numbers: Sunday Telegraph.

October...









Apple day
An apple on Apple Day...




Battle of Trafalgar
William Clarkson Stanfield, The Battle of Trafalgar, 1805 [LINK]




Autumn leaves
Red October...[Link]


October...


Apple day
An apple on Apple Day...
Battle of Trafalgar
William Clarkson Stanfield, The Battle of Trafalgar, 1805 [LINK]
Autumn leaves
Red October...[Link]

Obama's one on one...




No, not another POTUS debate (even though there is one left) and to be honest it may not even involve Obama, unless he wins...and unless it goes ahead: a report in the NYT says "U.S. Officials Say Iran Has Agreed to Nuclear Talks". Well agreed in principle but it will be a first...and could "[set] the stage for what could be a last-ditch diplomatic effort to avert a military strike on Iran". If the talks go ahead - I'm sure the Mullahs are against - I have no doubt that money will play a big part: Iran is hurting. Anyway, the point is the irony: news of these talks comes exactly 50 years since the last time the world has come near to actual nuclear strikes: next week is the 50th anniversary of Black Saturday, the 'eye to eye' of the Cuban Missile Crisis when 'while the risk of war was very high', however, "it was not caused by a clash of wills. The real dangers arose from 'the fog of war.' As the two superpowers geared up for a nuclear war, the chances of something going terribly wrong increased exponentially. To their credit, both Kennedy and Khrushchev understood this dynamic, which became particularly evident on the most nerve-racking day of all, 'Black Saturday.' By Saturday, Oct. 27, the two leaders were no longer in full control of their gigantic military machines..." interesting stuff; I doubt it could happen again, (could it? I really don't have faith in any of today's leaders) but as Michael Dobbs writes,


"The most important lesson [JFK] drew from it was that mistakes and misunderstandings can unleash an unpredictable chain of events, causing governments to go to war with little understanding of the consequences."

Update: LOL, Iran has denied the NYT report and it was also described as inaccurate by the US! 

Obama's one on one...


No, not another POTUS debate (even though there is one left) and to be honest it may not even involve Obama, unless he wins...and unless it goes ahead: a report in the NYT says "U.S. Officials Say Iran Has Agreed to Nuclear Talks". Well agreed in principle but it will be a first...and could "[set] the stage for what could be a last-ditch diplomatic effort to avert a military strike on Iran". If the talks go ahead - I'm sure the Mullahs are against - I have no doubt that money will play a big part: Iran is hurting. Anyway, the point is the irony: news of these talks comes exactly 50 years since the last time the world has come near to actual nuclear strikes: next week is the 50th anniversary of Black Saturday, the 'eye to eye' of the Cuban Missile Crisis when 'while the risk of war was very high', however, "it was not caused by a clash of wills. The real dangers arose from 'the fog of war.' As the two superpowers geared up for a nuclear war, the chances of something going terribly wrong increased exponentially. To their credit, both Kennedy and Khrushchev understood this dynamic, which became particularly evident on the most nerve-racking day of all, 'Black Saturday.' By Saturday, Oct. 27, the two leaders were no longer in full control of their gigantic military machines..." interesting stuff; I doubt it could happen again, (could it? I really don't have faith in any of today's leaders) but as Michael Dobbs writes,
"The most important lesson [JFK] drew from it was that mistakes and misunderstandings can unleash an unpredictable chain of events, causing governments to go to war with little understanding of the consequences."
Update: LOL, Iran has denied the NYT report and it was also described as inaccurate by the US! 

viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012

Old Ows opinion...






Many City economists were surprised to see that Government borrowing is down; don't worry, I'm not going to praise GO or say it's all as planned but I did like the info HERE at Guardian data blog. What irritated me was that in the image (click to enlarge) they had squeezed the picture of Brown far to the left making him appear over only those 'good' years of surplus (which was when, as we all know, he followed Conservative spending plans) and have the picture of Darling spread over most of the Crash Gordon years and we ALL now know, and it isn't hard to see, that Britain's debt soared from 2000 and Brown was to blame. It is petty things like the positioning of the Chancellors' pictures that annoy me (yes, yes, OK, I'm small minded and petty when it comes to Gordon Brown). Anyway, taking time before another day 'at the office' here in Guadalajara, I popped in to comment and decided to read what was being said...and there I got a surprise to see I had already commented several times on the first page (highly recommended too); no, not hacked, just comments on the original article back in May 2010. It is still interesting to read and of course I write that to clear-up Labour's mess will take a few years.

Old Ows opinion...


Many City economists were surprised to see that Government borrowing is down; don't worry, I'm not going to praise GO or say it's all as planned but I did like the info HERE at Guardian data blog. What irritated me was that in the image (click to enlarge) they had squeezed the picture of Brown far to the left making him appear over only those 'good' years of surplus (which was when, as we all know, he followed Conservative spending plans) and have the picture of Darling spread over most of the Crash Gordon years and we ALL now know, and it isn't hard to see, that Britain's debt soared from 2000 and Brown was to blame. It is petty things like the positioning of the Chancellors' pictures that annoy me (yes, yes, OK, I'm small minded and petty when it comes to Gordon Brown). Anyway, taking time before another day 'at the office' here in Guadalajara, I popped in to comment and decided to read what was being said...and there I got a surprise to see I had already commented several times on the first page (highly recommended too); no, not hacked, just comments on the original article back in May 2010. It is still interesting to read and of course I write that to clear-up Labour's mess will take a few years.

martes, 9 de octubre de 2012

Obverting offerings...






And we wonder why the government has no money (well it doesn't, it's our money but you know what I mean). Guido writes that the Centre for Policy Studies has found that 53.4% of UK households receive more in benefits than they pay in taxes; this is a very high figure.  "These trends are unsustainable – particularly given the ageing profile of the UK population", said Tim Knox, Director of the CPS. Of course, you may say, as this includes all pensioners the number is skewed; so looking at the study [PDF], even without "retired households" the total is still a horrendously high 40%! In 1979 31.7% of non-retired households were net recipients of the state and by 2000/01 this had fallen as low as 29.0 per cent,"However, over the past ten years to 2010/11, the proportion of households who are now net
recipients of the state has increased to 39.6 per cent.
" Ryan Bourne, Head of Economics at the CPS said:


"These data show that even before the financial crisis, the Labour government was ramping up spending on cash benefits and benefits in kind without corresponding increases in taxation. This was not redistribution from rich to poor, but redistribution from the future to the present. It felt good at the time, but given the government doesn't have its own money, was unsustainable."


Obverting offerings...


And we wonder why the government has no money (well it doesn't, it's our money but you know what I mean). Guido writes that the Centre for Policy Studies has found that 53.4% of UK households receive more in benefits than they pay in taxes; this is a very high figure.  "These trends are unsustainable – particularly given the ageing profile of the UK population", said Tim Knox, Director of the CPS. Of course, you may say, as this includes all pensioners the number is skewed; so looking at the study [PDF], even without "retired households" the total is still a horrendously high 40%! In 1979 31.7% of non-retired households were net recipients of the state and by 2000/01 this had fallen as low as 29.0 per cent,"However, over the past ten years to 2010/11, the proportion of households who are now net recipients of the state has increased to 39.6 per cent." Ryan Bourne, Head of Economics at the CPS said:
"These data show that even before the financial crisis, the Labour government was ramping up spending on cash benefits and benefits in kind without corresponding increases in taxation. This was not redistribution from rich to poor, but redistribution from the future to the present. It felt good at the time, but given the government doesn't have its own money, was unsustainable."

lunes, 8 de octubre de 2012

Oh...




Bugger, Krusty wasn't kancelled...but something isn't right. Was voter turnout really so high? Exit polls gave Capriles a 3% win...could they be SO wrong? Were all the votes really counted that quickly: the result was announced at 10:38 pm on election day (at 7:30 pm  people were still voting - the voting system is very efficient though)? Everyone is too quiet...both sides. Anyway, just on the numbers, remember this post: "Who knows what actual advantage this will give for or against but as an hypothetical estimate, if all parties are given similar support then as much as 10% of the total vote will be null and void!".  Chavez won by 9%...

Oh...


Bugger, Krusty wasn't kancelled...but something isn't right. Was voter turnout really so high? Exit polls gave Capriles a 3% win...could they be SO wrong? Were all the votes really counted that quickly: the result was announced at 10:38 pm on election day (at 7:30 pm  people were still voting - the voting system is very efficient though)? Everyone is too quiet...both sides. Anyway, just on the numbers, remember this post: "Who knows what actual advantage this will give for or against but as an hypothetical estimate, if all parties are given similar support then as much as 10% of the total vote will be null and void!".  Chavez won by 9%...

domingo, 7 de octubre de 2012

Opposing obscurantism...






Isabel Hardman of The Spectator writing about Grant Shapps' speech at the Conservative conference (I'll be checking the BBC coverage to see if it matches the wall to wall obsequious drivel they published during Labour's sorry efforts last week): worth shouting about IMHO...


"Why don't we spend enough time explaining the good things we've done, in impossible circumstances? Why are we the shy Tories? How many people know we've cut a quarter off the deficit? Cut tax for 24 million people? Taken another 2 million people out of tax entirely? Do they know that 457,000 people started apprenticeships – not since the last general election – but in the last year alone?" 


Opposing obscurantism...


Isabel Hardman of The Spectator writing about Grant Shapps' speech at the Conservative conference (I'll be checking the BBC coverage to see if it matches the wall to wall obsequious drivel they published during Labour's sorry efforts last week): worth shouting about IMHO...
"Why don't we spend enough time explaining the good things we've done, in impossible circumstances? Why are we the shy Tories? How many people know we've cut a quarter off the deficit? Cut tax for 24 million people? Taken another 2 million people out of tax entirely? Do they know that 457,000 people started apprenticeships – not since the last general election – but in the last year alone?" 

Orinico obsecration...






I live in hope that today it rains on his parade...Anyway, something well worth a read: in the NYT Francisco Toro writes on the Opinion pages: "How Hugo Chávez Became Irrelevant" [LINK]. I hope el pueblo venezolano agree with that opinion.  And from El Universal: "Opposition candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski started the give and take whereas Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez kept closed and guarded for the first time in quite a long time." IMHO El payaso pudrido offers only a split Venezuela. El flaco will create a united Venezuela.

Orinico obsecration...


I live in hope that today it rains on his parade...Anyway, something well worth a read: in the NYT Francisco Toro writes on the Opinion pages: "How Hugo Chávez Became Irrelevant" [LINK]. I hope el pueblo venezolano agree with that opinion.  And from El Universal: "Opposition candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski started the give and take whereas Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez kept closed and guarded for the first time in quite a long time." IMHO El payaso pudrido offers only a split Venezuela. El flaco will create a united Venezuela.

sábado, 6 de octubre de 2012

Obamamaniacs...






After everyone realised there was no real defence for Obama to be so badly prepared in the first of the 2012 US presidential debates, the Lefty hoards seem not to care how ridiculous their excuses become. We've had the thin air excuse; they claimed Romney was lying, they claimed he was all style over substance and now it's no less than handkerchief gate. They tried to claim Romney had hidden notes. Last night Jeremy Vine even tweeted (image left, click for thread) something that had already been debunked. The replies to that Tweet show just how sick and blinkered many on the Left really are. Oddly, my polite reply seems to have been deleted. Anyway, we can all see the evidence of who wrote what: Obama's debate notes. Romney's "cheat-sheet". Hat-tip BiasedBBC thread. 

Obamamaniacs...


After everyone realised there was no real defence for Obama to be so badly prepared in the first of the 2012 US presidential debates, the Lefty hoards seem not to care how ridiculous their excuses become. We've had the thin air excuse; they claimed Romney was lying, they claimed he was all style over substance and now it's no less than handkerchief gate. They tried to claim Romney had hidden notes. Last night Jeremy Vine even tweeted (image left, click for thread) something that had already been debunked. The replies to that Tweet show just how sick and blinkered many on the Left really are. Oddly, my polite reply seems to have been deleted. Anyway, we can all see the evidence of who wrote what: Obama's debate notes. Romney's "cheat-sheet". Hat-tip BiasedBBC thread. 

viernes, 5 de octubre de 2012

Obama off?...




Now you ask is that "off" as in 'not too good' or "off" as in 'going away'? Well, it could be BOTH! After crashing and burning in the the 1st presidential debate even the toady and grossly bias left-wing media haven't been able to avoid admitting that Obama was well under par...or maybe the truth is that this is par when he's got to answer without preparation, without advisers, without tele-prompters. Obama has since tried to claim Romney was lying, he wasn't. Anyway BHO was well off and Gore and others think it could be the thin air! Alternatively, maybe Obama's backers have realised they made a huge mistake in getting a man elected just because he's black (even though his mother was white and he was raised by her parents but...whatever) and are getting him retired to the recently purchased 35 million dollar estate on Hawaii (4 part report HERE) Is Obama trying to lose? Off because he's off?

Obama off?...


Now you ask is that "off" as in 'not too good' or "off" as in 'going away'? Well, it could be BOTH! After crashing and burning in the the 1st presidential debate even the toady and grossly bias left-wing media haven't been able to avoid admitting that Obama was well under par...or maybe the truth is that this is par when he's got to answer without preparation, without advisers, without tele-prompters. Obama has since tried to claim Romney was lying, he wasn't. Anyway BHO was well off and Gore and others think it could be the thin air! Alternatively, maybe Obama's backers have realised they made a huge mistake in getting a man elected just because he's black (even though his mother was white and he was raised by her parents but...whatever) and are getting him retired to the recently purchased 35 million dollar estate on Hawaii (4 part report HERE) Is Obama trying to lose? Off because he's off?