miércoles, 28 de agosto de 2019

Obvious oblectation; ominous obloquy






Prorogation of parliament is entirely NORMAL!


"Prorogation... marks the end of a
parliamentary session. It is the formal name given to the period between the end of a session of Parliament and the State Opening of Parliament that begins the next session. The parliamentary session may also be prorogued before Parliament is dissolved."

[Added] Also, back in May 2019, well over a 100 days ago, "the current parliamentary session reached a striking landmark. It
became the longest session by sitting days since the English Civil War
(1642-51)"
[House of Commons Library] !!



Obvious oblectation: 'She’s not "just a figurehead''. "Her Majesty The Queen is Britain’s final constitutional backstop... 



...Such authority is historically sound.

  

"A.V. Dicey wrote in 'The Law of the Constitution' (1885): "The House can in accordance with the constitution be deprived of power [when] there is fair reason to suppose that the opinion of the House is not the opinion of the electors."" 



"Edmund Burke noted: "The virtue, spirit, and essence of an House of Commons consists in its being the express image of the feelings of the nation. It was not instituted to be a controul upon the people, as of late it has been taught, by a doctrine of the most pernicious tendency. It was designed as a controul for the people."" [Raheem Kassam]



It stuns me how ignorant and thick many of the UK's MPs are. You can understand the waily, shrieky, undemocratic, pathetic, sinister Remain shouty tossers not understanding, but our duly elected officials you would think understood. Nope. Dumb fucks of ALL parties shouldn't be anywhere near power.



Ominous obloquy: Intersetingly, on Raheem's own website, I found out for the first time that the recent G7 summit agreed a "hate speech charter" as if the current draconian thought crimes aren't enough. Was this reported in the UK?

Obvious oblectation; ominous obloquy


Prorogation of parliament is entirely NORMAL!
"Prorogation... marks the end of a parliamentary session. It is the formal name given to the period between the end of a session of Parliament and the State Opening of Parliament that begins the next session. The parliamentary session may also be prorogued before Parliament is dissolved."
[Added] Also, back in May 2019, well over a 100 days ago, "the current parliamentary session reached a striking landmark. It became the longest session by sitting days since the English Civil War (1642-51)" [House of Commons Library] !!

Obvious oblectation: 'She’s not "just a figurehead''. "Her Majesty The Queen is Britain’s final constitutional backstop... 

...Such authority is historically sound.
  
"A.V. Dicey wrote in 'The Law of the Constitution' (1885): "The House can in accordance with the constitution be deprived of power [when] there is fair reason to suppose that the opinion of the House is not the opinion of the electors."" 

"Edmund Burke noted: "The virtue, spirit, and essence of an House of Commons consists in its being the express image of the feelings of the nation. It was not instituted to be a controul upon the people, as of late it has been taught, by a doctrine of the most pernicious tendency. It was designed as a controul for the people."" [Raheem Kassam]

It stuns me how ignorant and thick many of the UK's MPs are. You can understand the waily, shrieky, undemocratic, pathetic, sinister Remain shouty tossers not understanding, but our duly elected officials you would think understood. Nope. Dumb fucks of ALL parties shouldn't be anywhere near power.

Ominous obloquy: Intersetingly, on Raheem's own website, I found out for the first time that the recent G7 summit agreed a "hate speech charter" as if the current draconian thought crimes aren't enough. Was this reported in the UK?

viernes, 23 de agosto de 2019

Odd obscurantism over one observation II...






"Europe will not be united unless it is able to reunite its history, recognize Communism and Nazism as a common legacy and bring about an honest and thorough debate on all the totalitarian crimes of the past century" (Prague Declaration). It is a strong document.


"...millions of victims of Communism and their families are entitled to enjoy justice, sympathy, understanding and recognition for their sufferings in the same way as the victims of Nazism have been morally and politically recognized".



a.k.a. The European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism. [Wiki]



People navel gazing won't help.  I wrote back then that it "never ceases to amaze me how Nazism, Hitler, Nazi Germany etc are
rightfully vilified yet the Soviet Communist regime is barely mentioned,
a willful forgetfulness; they even call it Stalinism presumably to not
taint 'Communism': I guess with so many left wing MPs and MEPs with
their past in the Communist parties they feel another name is needed.
"



The Prague Declaration has not been without it's critics but "Those who neglect their past have no future".

Odd obscurantism over one observation II...


"Europe will not be united unless it is able to reunite its history, recognize Communism and Nazism as a common legacy and bring about an honest and thorough debate on all the totalitarian crimes of the past century" (Prague Declaration). It is a strong document.
"...millions of victims of Communism and their families are entitled to enjoy justice, sympathy, understanding and recognition for their sufferings in the same way as the victims of Nazism have been morally and politically recognized".

a.k.a. The European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism. [Wiki]

People navel gazing won't help.  I wrote back then that it "never ceases to amaze me how Nazism, Hitler, Nazi Germany etc are rightfully vilified yet the Soviet Communist regime is barely mentioned, a willful forgetfulness; they even call it Stalinism presumably to not taint 'Communism': I guess with so many left wing MPs and MEPs with their past in the Communist parties they feel another name is needed."

The Prague Declaration has not been without it's critics but "Those who neglect their past have no future".

jueves, 22 de agosto de 2019

Overcrowding or overreacting II...




OK, OK, I've been wittering on about immigration for a while, and nothing changes: I'll repeat some of those words from last year:


  • There is no housing crisis: there is an immigration crisis.



  • There is no hospital/A&E crisis: there is an immigration crisis. 



  • There is no school-place/teacher crisis: there is an immigration crisis.



  • There is no doctor/nurse numbers crisis: there is an immigration crisis.



  • There is no police/fire service crisis: there is an immigration crisis.



  • There is no infrastructure/road crisis: there is an immigration crisis.



  • There is no employment crisis: there is an immigration crisis.  


As Migration watch says: "What is the problem?" [LINK] "Immigration is a natural part of an open economy and society. The
problem for the UK is that the current level of immigration is much too
high
."





Now, to make matters worse, the Office of National Statistics say they have been underestimating migration numbers for ages, something we really knew but nobody can prove: "Our research has clearly shown that no single source of data can fully reflect the complexity of migration."...getting their excuses in early.





Trouble is, ONS is 'official' figures and the excellent Migration Watch also work off 'official' figures; the UK population 'officially' stands at 67 million . HOWEVER, it is surely much, much higher: "...the population of the UK is presently somewhere between 77 and 80 million"...in 2007! [LINK], that report disappeared for a while and has resurfaced. That article has also had its debunkers but amusingly no proof has ever been given to really disprove it; yet with the inaccuracy of the census, hundreds of thousands of additonal National Insurance numbers every year, the plethora of crises (see list above), the unknown number of illegal immigrants etc., we can safely say the article was most likely more right than wrong...and the ONS figures are a massive UNDER estimate.



Overcrowding or overreacting II...


OK, OK, I've been wittering on about immigration for a while, and nothing changes: I'll repeat some of those words from last year:
  • There is no housing crisis: there is an immigration crisis.
  • There is no hospital/A&E crisis: there is an immigration crisis. 
  • There is no school-place/teacher crisis: there is an immigration crisis.
  • There is no doctor/nurse numbers crisis: there is an immigration crisis.
  • There is no police/fire service crisis: there is an immigration crisis.
  • There is no infrastructure/road crisis: there is an immigration crisis.
  • There is no employment crisis: there is an immigration crisis.  
As Migration watch says: "What is the problem?" [LINK] "Immigration is a natural part of an open economy and society. The problem for the UK is that the current level of immigration is much too high."

Now, to make matters worse, the Office of National Statistics say they have been underestimating migration numbers for ages, something we really knew but nobody can prove: "Our research has clearly shown that no single source of data can fully reflect the complexity of migration."...getting their excuses in early.

Trouble is, ONS is 'official' figures and the excellent Migration Watch also work off 'official' figures; the UK population 'officially' stands at 67 million . HOWEVER, it is surely much, much higher: "...the population of the UK is presently somewhere between 77 and 80 million"...in 2007! [LINK], that report disappeared for a while and has resurfaced. That article has also had its debunkers but amusingly no proof has ever been given to really disprove it; yet with the inaccuracy of the census, hundreds of thousands of additonal National Insurance numbers every year, the plethora of crises (see list above), the unknown number of illegal immigrants etc., we can safely say the article was most likely more right than wrong...and the ONS figures are a massive UNDER estimate.

viernes, 9 de agosto de 2019

Obviously orchestrated opposition odium...




Just a follow-on really, from Obvious opposition odium... had added updates but there were so many links thought it would be better making a further post...clearer than ever that the "white supremacy" COORDINATED attacks (inc. plethora of Charlottesville misquotes making headlines again) has replaced the failed attempt at getting The Donald impeached over "Russia".



End of previous blog-post and updates: 'FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not
Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and
abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes
spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'.
Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left.
They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say
it?' 



Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth
Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an
interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.



Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK] The War on White Supremacist Terror (sarc)


"

Nice.

Obviously orchestrated opposition odium...


Just a follow-on really, from Obvious opposition odium... had added updates but there were so many links thought it would be better making a further post...clearer than ever that the "white supremacy" COORDINATED attacks (inc. plethora of Charlottesville misquotes making headlines again) has replaced the failed attempt at getting The Donald impeached over "Russia".

End of previous blog-post and updates: 'FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'. Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left. They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say it?' 

Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.

Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK] The War on White Supremacist Terror (sarc)
"
Nice.

miércoles, 7 de agosto de 2019

Obvious opposition odium...







White supremacists everywhere...it's the new buzzphrase in the USA, a clear and blatant - coordinated - effort by the Democrats, the fake-news-MSM and the carzy Left (can you tell the difference these days?) to demonise The Donald. Beto O'Rouke is on a misson, not sure what yet but obviously he is intentionally making headlines by spouting shit; it's anti-Trump shit so gets a lot of support [Guardian...source MSNBC]. I am guessing it's a last ditch effort to get near double figures in the 2020 POTUS Dem candidacy. Only this week: "I mean the president has not been shy. He’s not been saying this behind
closed doors. This is out in the open. All people of one religion,
inherently defective … should be banned from the shores of this
country
,” O’Rourke said on MSNBC.
Did you note the strawmen raised there? "All"... "defective".
He went on: “The only modern Western democracy… that said anything close to this is
the Third Reich, Nazi Germany.




Comparisons to Hitler are nothing new and even against Trump are nothing new (from 2016) but the lefty pricks in the USA - and especially it seems the failing MSM (CNN, MSNBC...looking at you) - seem to be attracting more dangerous ranters - encouraging them and certainly not admonishing them - than could be called a coincidence; now they have gone full retard: on NBC: "Bizarre - Former FBI Official: Trump Ordered Flags Flown At Half-Staff To Honor Hitler" [LINK]...because it is the 8th of the 8th (HH) and you'd think he'd be cut-off or questioned but already on twitter there are many saying how sinsiter that is...and they're serious!

Back in July, Democrat Steve Cohen: "It was more reminiscent of Germany during the beginnings of the Hitler regime."

This week, nutter Democrat Jerrold Nadler said "reminds me of the 1930s in Germany."...after setting up several strawmen in one sentence: "What's the connection between background checks and immigration
reform?
"  on Morning Joe [who else, LOL] "That we have to keep guns out of the
hands out of the invading hordes of less-than human people coming across
our border? That's the implication.
" Invading hordes? less than human?



I mean, even more bizarre: MSNBC again: WTF? "MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace falsely claims that Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos” or Russian Impeachment Mika (neds a new tune: "the President of the United States of WANTING mass murders to happen." Funnily enough, that cahrge could be more logically applied to MSNBC reporters and staff and many others with trump Derangement Syndrome.



Even usually sensible sources are doing it: "The Rise of the American Gestapo: Has It Already Happened Here?" "Despite the finger-pointing and outcries of dismay from those who are watching the government discard the rule of law at every turn, the question is not whether Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler but whether the American Police State is the new Third Reich." [LINK]



FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not
Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and
abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes
spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'.
Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left.
They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say
it? 



Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth
Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an
interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.



Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK]


"

Nice.


Obvious opposition odium...


White supremacists everywhere...it's the new buzzphrase in the USA, a clear and blatant - coordinated - effort by the Democrats, the fake-news-MSM and the carzy Left (can you tell the difference these days?) to demonise The Donald. Beto O'Rouke is on a misson, not sure what yet but obviously he is intentionally making headlines by spouting shit; it's anti-Trump shit so gets a lot of support [Guardian...source MSNBC]. I am guessing it's a last ditch effort to get near double figures in the 2020 POTUS Dem candidacy. Only this week: "I mean the president has not been shy. He’s not been saying this behind closed doors. This is out in the open. All people of one religion, inherently defective … should be banned from the shores of this country,” O’Rourke said on MSNBC. Did you note the strawmen raised there? "All"... "defective". He went on: “The only modern Western democracy… that said anything close to this is the Third Reich, Nazi Germany.

Comparisons to Hitler are nothing new and even against Trump are nothing new (from 2016) but the lefty pricks in the USA - and especially it seems the failing MSM (CNN, MSNBC...looking at you) - seem to be attracting more dangerous ranters - encouraging them and certainly not admonishing them - than could be called a coincidence; now they have gone full retard: on NBC: "Bizarre - Former FBI Official: Trump Ordered Flags Flown At Half-Staff To Honor Hitler" [LINK]...because it is the 8th of the 8th (HH) and you'd think he'd be cut-off or questioned but already on twitter there are many saying how sinsiter that is...and they're serious! Back in July, Democrat Steve Cohen: "It was more reminiscent of Germany during the beginnings of the Hitler regime." This week, nutter Democrat Jerrold Nadler said "reminds me of the 1930s in Germany."...after setting up several strawmen in one sentence: "What's the connection between background checks and immigration reform?"  on Morning Joe [who else, LOL] "That we have to keep guns out of the hands out of the invading hordes of less-than human people coming across our border? That's the implication." Invading hordes? less than human?

I mean, even more bizarre: MSNBC again: WTF? "MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace falsely claims that Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos” or Russian Impeachment Mika (neds a new tune: "the President of the United States of WANTING mass murders to happen." Funnily enough, that cahrge could be more logically applied to MSNBC reporters and staff and many others with trump Derangement Syndrome.

Even usually sensible sources are doing it: "The Rise of the American Gestapo: Has It Already Happened Here?" "Despite the finger-pointing and outcries of dismay from those who are watching the government discard the rule of law at every turn, the question is not whether Donald Trump is the new Adolf Hitler but whether the American Police State is the new Third Reich." [LINK]

FFS. O'Rouke et al are CAUSING the violence, not Trump! MSNBC, CNN and thier truly ignorant talking heads are aiding and abetting the rise in violence, not Trump! The social media hordes spouting evil and threatening violence are mainly from 'the Left'. Antifa and other assorted violent twats are almost entirely of the Left. They always are... and where does it normally end?  ...Well, dare I say it? 

Added 08/08: (oh no, Hitler Day!): Elizabeth Warren is another: "Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading Democratic presidential candidate, said in an interview that she believed Donald Trump was a white supremacist." Clueless.

Added 09/08: Also like-minded: "And the mandarins of The New York Times were just getting started with the terrorism hysteria." [LINK]
"
Nice.