Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta UKIP. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta UKIP. Mostrar todas las entradas

sábado, 9 de mayo de 2015

Offering opportunity II...








UKIP heaven. They have only got one seat in the House of Commons (with 12.6% of the total vote!) and they may have come 2nd in over 100 constituencies (see Update 2 on previous post) across SE and SW England and the Midlands but, more than this, surely the map that highlights UKIP's success the 'most' is the one above, which shows the biggest party swing in each constituency (See 16.38 'The biggest swingers'); UKIP performed in almost every single English constituency. For David Cameron the future's bright; if he was pragmatic (thanks alexsandr at Speccie) could it be blue and purple?

Offering opportunity II...



UKIP heaven. They have only got one seat in the House of Commons (with 12.6% of the total vote!) and they may have come 2nd in over 100 constituencies (see Update 2 on previous post) across SE and SW England and the Midlands but, more than this, surely the map that highlights UKIP's success the 'most' is the one above, which shows the biggest party swing in each constituency (See 16.38 'The biggest swingers'); UKIP performed in almost every single English constituency. For David Cameron the future's bright; if he was pragmatic (thanks alexsandr at Speccie) could it be blue and purple?

miércoles, 6 de mayo de 2015

Only one option...








Everyone seems sure we're on the way to another hung parliament and another coalition of one mix of hues or another. There is only one option, surely (apart from the obvious best options of a Conservative majority or CON/UKIP Coalition)? I cannot believe the electorate would 'cut off their nose to spite their face'; well see. An Interesting article in the Spectator about newspapers and how they 'vote', [Link] or how they "generally... serve up what they believe their readers want". Nothing too earth-shattering about perceived political bent of the various newspapers; the only exception and 'gamble' as such in the current UK general Election campaign is that of The Independent, who have opted for 'more of the same'.




Update 7th May: Interesting follow-up: Order-order today has THIS. The graphic is from 7,000 articles analysed which found that The Mirror was the most partisan newspaper. Again, nothing we didn't already know but good to have it 'confirmed'.

Only one option...



Everyone seems sure we're on the way to another hung parliament and another coalition of one mix of hues or another. There is only one option, surely (apart from the obvious best options of a Conservative majority or CON/UKIP Coalition)? I cannot believe the electorate would 'cut off their nose to spite their face'; well see. An Interesting article in the Spectator about newspapers and how they 'vote', [Link] or how they "generally... serve up what they believe their readers want". Nothing too earth-shattering about perceived political bent of the various newspapers; the only exception and 'gamble' as such in the current UK general Election campaign is that of The Independent, who have opted for 'more of the same'.

Update 7th May: Interesting follow-up: Order-order today has THIS. The graphic is from 7,000 articles analysed which found that The Mirror was the most partisan newspaper. Again, nothing we didn't already know but good to have it 'confirmed'.

miércoles, 21 de mayo de 2014

Over or out...







Sorry Dave, not this time (I hope you get 2nd!). Probably next year. Even Google backs UKIP "A cross in the bottom box on your ballot paper today is a vote for UKIP…"


Over or out...


Sorry Dave, not this time (I hope you get 2nd!). Probably next year. Even Google backs UKIP "A cross in the bottom box on your ballot paper today is a vote for UKIP…"

sábado, 15 de febrero de 2014

Obnubilation obloquy: official...




As usual not much can be read into the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election; UKIP did come second as most were predicting and are set to make many more headlines in the Euro elections in May...but what is so shocking and a dire reflection of the state of hoi polloi is their almost total lack of participation in how and who runs the country: it is woeful when you read the figures: yes turnout is low at by-elections but here less than 2 in 10 people turned up to vote (1.63).  Total turnout was a little over 28%, around 24,000 votes BUT postal votes accounted for over 10,000. 72% didn't vote: the winner got about 15% of the electorate. Classy.





Now, 42% of votes in this by-election being postal votes is nowhere near a record (58%!) but it does increase the worry: seven years ago it had already been going on too long (yet another New Labour shit-fest we are stuck with for over a decade) but was largely deemed to be a problem in certain cities and certain 'communities'; however, political campaigns and improving situations and 'events, dear boy, events' mean nothing if half the electorate are already hard-wired in having already voted. Corruption, 'Banana Republic', 'inherently unsatisfactory', gross manipulation, abuse of the system...end it now!

Obnubilation obloquy: official...


As usual not much can be read into the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election; UKIP did come second as most were predicting and are set to make many more headlines in the Euro elections in May...but what is so shocking and a dire reflection of the state of hoi polloi is their almost total lack of participation in how and who runs the country: it is woeful when you read the figures: yes turnout is low at by-elections but here less than 2 in 10 people turned up to vote (1.63).  Total turnout was a little over 28%, around 24,000 votes BUT postal votes accounted for over 10,000. 72% didn't vote: the winner got about 15% of the electorate. Classy.

Now, 42% of votes in this by-election being postal votes is nowhere near a record (58%!) but it does increase the worry: seven years ago it had already been going on too long (yet another New Labour shit-fest we are stuck with for over a decade) but was largely deemed to be a problem in certain cities and certain 'communities'; however, political campaigns and improving situations and 'events, dear boy, events' mean nothing if half the electorate are already hard-wired in having already voted. Corruption, 'Banana Republic', 'inherently unsatisfactory', gross manipulation, abuse of the system...end it now!

martes, 14 de mayo de 2013

Opposition opportunities...







[LINK] Wow, just wow. It is sure to hold for the European elections in 2014, and by then we will presumably have other indicators as to whether it will hold for the General Election 2015...


Opposition opportunities...


[LINK] Wow, just wow. It is sure to hold for the European elections in 2014, and by then we will presumably have other indicators as to whether it will hold for the General Election 2015...

viernes, 30 de noviembre de 2012

Obvious outcome...






IMHO there's not really too much to read into Labour's triple by-election victory yesterday, except that Middlesbrough must be full of Labour drone-clones because they nearly managed the impossible of getting the same number of votes as in a general election. [09:06 a.m. scratch that, misread]. I have adapted a graph (left) taken from a good amount of information on the Rotherham constituency at 'all that's left' here and added yesterday's results. Good analysis from Durotrigan ("good for UKIP, better for Labour") and a handy table of the numbers from Raedwald ("LibDems utterly destroyed in by-elections").



Update: Apparently 50% of the votes were postal votes...(Here, scroll down to 11:51 am).

Obvious outcome...


IMHO there's not really too much to read into Labour's triple by-election victory yesterday, except that Middlesbrough must be full of Labour drone-clones because they nearly managed the impossible of getting the same number of votes as in a general election. [09:06 a.m. scratch that, misread]. I have adapted a graph (left) taken from a good amount of information on the Rotherham constituency at 'all that's left' here and added yesterday's results. Good analysis from Durotrigan ("good for UKIP, better for Labour") and a handy table of the numbers from Raedwald ("LibDems utterly destroyed in by-elections").

Update: Apparently 50% of the votes were postal votes...(Here, scroll down to 11:51 am).

jueves, 29 de noviembre de 2012

Ophic oleaginousness...






EU Referendum says it: 'Blair: with enemies like these...'. UKIP's marked increase in coverage lately is getting a further boost: what could be better than ex PM arch-vampire Tony Blair on the other side spouting hyperbole: in a speech last night to pro-EU Business for New Europe group he said that Euroscepticism was spreading "like a virus". "If ever there is anything that should convince the Conservatives to push for the exit [of the E.U.] it is that. Anything Blair is promoting has to be wholly wrong. That he thinks of the cause as a "virus" tells you more about him than eurosceptics" [sic].  Iain Watson (BBC News Political correspondent) asks if UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage believes [Blair's] influence will be negligible, Farage's assessment: was that Blair  - like his promises - is "past his 'use-by date' and that voters would not listen to a man who put 'snake oil rather than milk on his cornflakes'".



By the way: THIS may scare you. 

Ophic oleaginousness...


EU Referendum says it: 'Blair: with enemies like these...'. UKIP's marked increase in coverage lately is getting a further boost: what could be better than ex PM arch-vampire Tony Blair on the other side spouting hyperbole: in a speech last night to pro-EU Business for New Europe group he said that Euroscepticism was spreading "like a virus". "If ever there is anything that should convince the Conservatives to push for the exit [of the E.U.] it is that. Anything Blair is promoting has to be wholly wrong. That he thinks of the cause as a "virus" tells you more about him than eurosceptics" [sic].  Iain Watson (BBC News Political correspondent) asks if UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage believes [Blair's] influence will be negligible, Farage's assessment: was that Blair  - like his promises - is "past his 'use-by date' and that voters would not listen to a man who put 'snake oil rather than milk on his cornflakes'".

By the way: THIS may scare you. 

sábado, 24 de noviembre de 2012

Overt outrage III...






Where Everybody Matters...Oh dear (serious). Anyway, I'm sure it's not a connection to the following but the council in Rotherham is 92% Labour. A few bits of news from the last few months first: "Rotherham sex abuse: More girls at risk" [BBC], "Rotherham: the authorities systematically failed to prevent the abuse of dozens of teenage girls" [SW], "Vulnerable white girl, known to have been abused from the age of 12, was offered Urdu and Punjabi lessons by Rotherham Council to 'educate her'", and "Police turned a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse of white girls by gangs of largely Pakistani men for more than a decade" [DM], 'Rotherham council hide and change key facts about men suspected of grooming girl for sex who they later murdered' [Times £] . We all know it has happened in many other British (and European...and everywhere we find this culture?) cities. Now, we read, a couple from near Rotherham who had foster children had them taken away after it was discovered they were...wait for it...supporters of UKIP!


"They took on the three children — a baby girl, a boy and an older girl, who were all from an ethnic minority and a troubled family background — in September in an emergency placement.
They believe that the youngsters thrived in their care. The couple were described as 'exemplary' foster parents: the baby put on weight and the older girl even began calling them 'mum and dad'"

Nigel Farage, UKIP's leader, called it "a bloody outrage", he's right. And the conspiracy theorist in me draws your attention to he fact that next week there is a by-election in Rotherham (Denis MacShane's seat).



Updates Sunday: 1. Interesting article from Andrew Gilligan in the Telegraph re the voting issues, labour's candidate and numbers in Rotherham [Link]. 2. Rotherham Politics: needs reading, and D Jones' comment on that blog-post.

Overt outrage III...


Where Everybody Matters...Oh dear (serious). Anyway, I'm sure it's not a connection to the following but the council in Rotherham is 92% Labour. A few bits of news from the last few months first: "Rotherham sex abuse: More girls at risk" [BBC], "Rotherham: the authorities systematically failed to prevent the abuse of dozens of teenage girls" [SW], "Vulnerable white girl, known to have been abused from the age of 12, was offered Urdu and Punjabi lessons by Rotherham Council to 'educate her'", and "Police turned a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse of white girls by gangs of largely Pakistani men for more than a decade" [DM], 'Rotherham council hide and change key facts about men suspected of grooming girl for sex who they later murdered' [Times £] . We all know it has happened in many other British (and European...and everywhere we find this culture?) cities. Now, we read, a couple from near Rotherham who had foster children had them taken away after it was discovered they were...wait for it...supporters of UKIP!
"They took on the three children — a baby girl, a boy and an older girl, who were all from an ethnic minority and a troubled family background — in September in an emergency placement. They believe that the youngsters thrived in their care. The couple were described as 'exemplary' foster parents: the baby put on weight and the older girl even began calling them 'mum and dad'"
Nigel Farage, UKIP's leader, called it "a bloody outrage", he's right. And the conspiracy theorist in me draws your attention to he fact that next week there is a by-election in Rotherham (Denis MacShane's seat).

Updates Sunday: 1. Interesting article from Andrew Gilligan in the Telegraph re the voting issues, labour's candidate and numbers in Rotherham [Link]. 2. Rotherham Politics: needs reading, and D Jones' comment on that blog-post.