miércoles, 28 de abril de 2010

Opiate offensive...


pppafghanistan
And you thought military action was complicated. The slide on the left (click to enlarge) is just so simple...LINK to NY Times article. "It's dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control, Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable."...don't worry, General McMaster means bullet points!

Bookmark and Share

martes, 27 de abril de 2010

Obvious obscurantism II...


A conspiracy of silence. "They may disagree in public, but privately they couldn't agree more. On the single most important issue facing the country after this election, our politicians think it's better to keep us in the dark." Nuff said. [Link] (Stephanie Flander's blog. BBC economics editor)

Update 11pm (UK): And apparently the media are starting to get frustrated with a lack of relies from politicians. Tomorrow's newspapers courtesy of Tim Montgomerie.

Bookmark and Share

lunes, 26 de abril de 2010

Oligodynamic oscitancy...


Don't be Cruel! Why and how did Labour's election campaign get to this: 'upping the tempo ' this past weekend with an Elvis impersonator?!!
 
[Edit: 'dead' video/image removed]
 
If that wasn't cringe-worthy enough the Labour rally joined in singing "The Wonder of You". There are a few - and more relevant - titles to Elvis hits below. Click on the image 'borrowed' from order-order.com to see what Guido's conspiracy theories are to try to explain the inexplicable: "The Brown Nixon Elvis Conspiracy Theory Competition". The first is that:

"Gordon is living out a Richard Nixon fantasy, he seems himself as a man of substance and policy, like Nixon, facing defeat at the hands of more photogenic and televisual opponents, with Clegg and Cameron playing the role of Kennedy"

Well worth a read but a point of order re that first theory: the Nixon/JFK debates are famous 'political debate' history with definite pros and cons of radio versus TV broadcasting! However Nixon didn't actually met Elvis until late 1970: a year when two of the latter's hits were "I've Lost You" and "I Really Don't Want to Know", both titles very appropriate to Brown's and Labour's election campaign. However, the Nixon/Elvis meeting wasn't made public until 1972 (surely nothing to do with the presidential election that year!)...a year which began for Elvis with "Until It's Time for You to Go" and ended with "Separate Ways". My God...it's uncanny. Also, here's hoping BROWN and TOAST doesn't just refer to a Maillard reaction. os·ci·tan·cy n. The act of yawning. The state of being drowsy or inattentive; dullness. oli·go·dy·nam·ic adjActive in very small quantities Bookmark and Share

Oligodynamic oscitancy...


Don't be Cruel! Why and how did Labour's election campaign get to this: 'upping the tempo ' this past weekend with an Elvis impersonator?!!

Nixon ElvisIf that wasn't cringe-worthy enough the Labour rally joined in singing "The Wonder of You". There are a few - and more relevant - titles to Elvis hits below. Click on the image 'borrowed' from order-order.com to see what Guido's conspiracy theories are to try to explain the inexplicable: "The Brown Nixon Elvis Conspiracy Theory Competition". The first is that:

"Gordon is living out a Richard Nixon fantasy, he seems himself as a man of substance and policy, like Nixon, facing defeat at the hands of more photogenic and televisual opponents, with Clegg and Cameron playing the role of Kennedy"

Well worth a read but a point of order re that first theory: the Nixon/JFK debates are famous 'political debate' history with definite pros and cons of radio versus TV broadcasting! However Nixon didn't actually met Elvis until late 1970: a year when two of the latter's hits were "I've Lost You" and "I Really Don't Want to Know", both titles very appropriate to Brown's and Labour's election campaign. However, the Nixon/Elvis meeting wasn't made public until 1972 (surely nothing to do with the presidential election that year!)...a year which began for Elvis with "Until It's Time for You to Go" and ended with "Separate Ways".

My God...it's uncanny. Also, here's hoping BROWN and TOAST doesn't just refer to a Maillard reaction.

os·ci·tan·cy
n.
The act of yawning. The state of being drowsy or inattentive; dullness.
oli·go·dy·nam·ic adj
Active in very small quantities

Bookmark and Share

domingo, 25 de abril de 2010


The ONS info is confirming many other people's previous predictions: that UK national debt could treble; making things worse is that as debt increases the tax receipts are falling*, down 11% in January. Click on image to enlarge (PDF) the excellent graphic in The Guardian.

* Burning Our Money has numerous blogposts on tax: just for info, four years ago (!!!) they estimated Britain's losses just to tax fraud and evasion are currently within the range £60-80bn every year. OK, I know that isn't entirely relevant re the reasons for current falls in tax receipts but it does highlight a major part of the overall problem. Paul, I know you're one of those mentioning falling tax receipts but I couldn't find a relevant blogpost (I did look!)!

Bookmark and Share

viernes, 23 de abril de 2010

Opinionated observation...


Following on from my St. George's Day post, Obliging observance, earlier today, I was trying to figure out why the UK and Ireland celebrate World Book Day on a different date to the rest of the world (btw, I've taken the day off; celebrating an unofficial bank holiday)

April 23rd has long been considered a symbolic date for world literature: two of the world's most celebrated authors, Miguel de Cervantes and William Shakespeare (who are, incidentally, also the world's two most translated authors!) - and putting aside the Julian and Gregorian calendar differences - both died on this day and in the same year (1616) as did "Inca" Garcilaso de la Vega. Catalan author Josep Pla also died on 23rd April. The date also coincides with the birth of Colombian writer Manuel Mejía Vallejo, French novelist Maurice Druon, Vladimir Nabokov (he of Lolita fame...and ignoring Julian/Gregorian calendar differences again - Russia being amongst the very last countries to change, only about 90 years ago!) and the Icelandic novelist and Nobel Prize in Literature winner Halldór Laxness. Other writers born on this day - not so famous but certainly well known - include Ngaio Marsh (NZ, one of the original four 'Queens of Crime') and Charles Farrar Browne (US, nom de plume, Artemus Ward).

Now given all that - and I'm sure there's more* - it was a natural choice for International Book Day: to "pay a world-wide tribute to books and authors on this date, encouraging everyone, and in particular young people, to discover the pleasure of reading and gain a renewed respect for the irreplaceable contributions of those who have furthered the social and cultural progress of humanity".

So, going back to my point (*yes there's more: dig a little deeper and you find that William Wordsworth and Rupert Brooke - both surely in anyone's Top Ten (or even Top 5!) English poets - also both died on 23rd April!) , given ALL the aformentioned, why did the UK decide to have a different day. I think I know, and IMHO it's not the official 'excuse':

"The initiative is so well established in schools here that we want to make sure that the Day happens in term time to really make the most of this opportunity to celebrate books and reading"

...now, sorry but that's bollocks: don't get me wrong, all those books, quick-read, vouchers, getting children reading etc, that's fine, that's great! But I think it's New-Labour-Tony-Blair smarm speak. "Now HOLD ON" (I hear you say), I know it's a registered charity (although we know that in many cases registered charities are 'government initiatives'...and by pure coincidence that very question is the 2nd of their FAQs) ...BUT, why do I think it's bollocks you ask? Well, there are 35 possible dates for Easter Sunday: from March 22 to April 25: look at this handy graph (2nd graph down, it makes what I'm getting at a lot clearer). April 25th is the latest possible date so even when schools have 2 weeks Easter holiday - with Easter weekend in the middle - the latest the term time break-up is ever going to be is 17/18th April so very roughly 80% or more of all "normal" International Book Days would be in term time.

You may have lost track by now so I'll say what I think: Tony Blair launched the UK individual different from the rest of the world book day in 1998 as a chance to spin: you remember, the sun always shone, cool Brittania, things could only bet better? Well IMHO this was (a) another great story for Saint Tony and boost the Fab we're so cool and nice look how we're giving book vouchers to children New Labour and (b) a conscious decision purely and simply to NOT HAVE IT on 23rd April (i.e. St George's Day) because New Labour are bunch of inept, corrupt, anti-English slimeball fuckwits (Blair was the eptiome of this) and I hope they get obliterated on May 6th, which incidently, was April 23rd in Shakespeare's day!

Bookmark and Share

Obliging observance...


Enjoy St. George's Day, celebrate it even though we do not know much about St. George. We do know that there has been a resurgence and rebirth of our Patron Saint as a cultural entity and identity most probably due to actual and perceived attempts to ignore, sideline or belittle England and the English.

So what to do? What to believe about this "not even English" soldier when even more than 1500 years ago details was vague: Pope Gelasius in 496 stated that George was among those saints "whose names are justly reverenced among men, but whose actions are known only to God" (presumably referring to the legend of St. George and the Dragon). Yet he is venerated in many Christian denominations and numerous cities, regions and countries, which is quite extraordinary considering, as previous mentioned, and as Gelasius' quote reveals, next to nothing is known about him for certain. Borrowing heavily from GodzDogz we can examine what he was renowned for: martyrdom, which isn't simply dying for what you believe in...

"Martyrdom is now an ambiguous and misunderstood phenomenon. If it simply means 'dying for what you believe', what makes that laudable and holy? It is certainly not laudable and holy if such a demise inflicts suffering and death on others, or if it is a deliberate taking of one’s own life removed from the context of threat and persecution in faith."

George, in the face of temptation (offered excessive wealth to renounce his belief) darkness, persecution, extended and brutal torture, chose death rather than do what was not right (he also gave away all his possessions to the poor when he realised what his final fate would be).

The first known mention of St George in England was by Bede in the 8th Century, and as mentioned in the 9th Century in Alfred the Great's will: "Saint George and his feast day began to gain more widespread fame among all Europeans, however, from the time of the Crusades".

"As a soldier he would have known battle, faced the possibility of death. This is not the issue. His submissive, passionate action, defying soldier’s orders, maintained compassion in the face of tyranny and justice at the risk of dishonour and treason. This is the example that so many have found in our patron saint, that sudden rush of love that falls on those born again in the Spirit, that at the last, changes one’s life."

So why is this Roman soldier - of what today would be Turkish and Palestinian descent - defining my country’s soul, why is George patron of England? Not because he defines who England is, but because he exemplifies what we should be: charitable, tolerant, brave, compassionate, honourable, Christian.

Bookmark and Share

martes, 20 de abril de 2010

Olympic offal...



How many times has Crash Gordon and New Labour trumpeted the number of jobs that the Olympic construction sites would offer. Last year the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) claimed "Local people are given priority in accessing training and jobs on-site through local job brokerage services in the local area,". Now, we hear that just one in eight jobs on the Olympic site have gone to local British workers! The London Evening Standard reports that:

"the Olympic Delivery Authority has been forced to reveal that just 828 workers out of the total 6,277 workers on the Olympic site are Britons who live locally in the most revealing snapshot of employment on the site."

The ODA agreed to release the local employment figures under the Freedom of Information Act after a six-month campaign by a shipping industry worker and local East End resident David Isted. [Link]

(Hat-tip Iain Dale: British Jobs for Foreign Workers)


Bookmark and Share