This is the day? No, not the fantastic The The track from the best album ever but Brexit...today? 12th April? 22nd May?
Get us out you fuckwits! There WILL be blood if you fuck this up.
viernes, 29 de marzo de 2019
Overwhelming 'Out' option...
This is the day? No, not the fantastic The The track from the best album ever but Brexit...today? 12th April? 22nd May?
Get us out you fuckwits! There WILL be blood if you fuck this up.
Overwhelming 'Out' option...
This is the day? No, not the fantastic The The track from the best album ever but Brexit...today? 12th April? 22nd May? Get us out you fuckwits! There WILL be blood if you fuck this up.
miércoles, 27 de marzo de 2019
Omission, obfuscation, obnubilation, obscurantism...
...or, in plain English, downright lying. Unbelievably the BBC is STILL reporting the petition calling on the government to revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU without ANY mention of the false signatures, multi-thousand repeat and joke signatures etc. The BBC is a multi-billion pound organisation that pretends it is impartial, it would take a child 10 seconds to discover the complete joke this petition is [LINK].
At least they have stopped saying it is the fastest-growing on record or the best-supported proposal in the history of the Commons, or other such 'keep this non-story' going piffle but to openly report it as genuine and as if it were corruption free is plain lying.
Also, the 'million person march' - a number easily debunked by anyone who can see - is now also officially debunked (it was really officially debunked the same day, anyone who has ever see a crowd of just a single football game knows how ridiculous the claims were). The BBC get around this unfortunate truth by saying things like "the organisers say" and can therefore leave their lying "million joined Brexit protest" headline in place.
The BBC are cunts but the cunting cunts in Parliament take the biscuit. However, just for info, remember who is voting for what when you come to help destroy these treacherous cunts at the ballot box: there are a cohort of 30 "Conservative" MPs who really need to be pilloried.
No, the irony of me using BBC info is not lost.
Omission, obfuscation, obnubilation, obscurantism...
...or, in plain English, downright lying. Unbelievably the BBC is STILL reporting the petition calling on the government to revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU without ANY mention of the false signatures, multi-thousand repeat and joke signatures etc. The BBC is a multi-billion pound organisation that pretends it is impartial, it would take a child 10 seconds to discover the complete joke this petition is [LINK].
At least they have stopped saying it is the fastest-growing on record or the best-supported proposal in the history of the Commons, or other such 'keep this non-story' going piffle but to openly report it as genuine and as if it were corruption free is plain lying.
Also, the 'million person march' - a number easily debunked by anyone who can see - is now also officially debunked (it was really officially debunked the same day, anyone who has ever see a crowd of just a single football game knows how ridiculous the claims were). The BBC get around this unfortunate truth by saying things like "the organisers say" and can therefore leave their lying "million joined Brexit protest" headline in place.
The BBC are cunts but the cunting cunts in Parliament take the biscuit. However, just for info, remember who is voting for what when you come to help destroy these treacherous cunts at the ballot box: there are a cohort of 30 "Conservative" MPs who really need to be pilloried.
No, the irony of me using BBC info is not lost.
viernes, 22 de marzo de 2019
Outing Oxbridge obreption...
How exciting that the petition calling on the government to revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU* is now over 3.36 million (yawn). It says "The government repeatedly claims exiting the EU is 'the will of the people'..."; yes we had referendum in 2016, no doubt you've forgotten.
Back then, in similar mode, there was Online omni-incompetence: a meaningless petition was started, and back then, like now, it was riddled with foreign and false signatures. Indeed, like then, the snowflakes were mobilised: "...if you go to the petition map you can see where most signatures are coming from: London, Bristol, Oxford, Cambridge, Brighton...yes, you get the idea: [edit 1620 hrs] a student/millennial/snowflake brigade are on a mission...".
Raedwald puts this weeks petition in context: People v. Parliament - the chasm widens: "Even if it reached 17.4m it would still be meaningless; it is open to fraud, abuse, hacking and manipulation. The map is instructive. The greatest proportion of clicks are from Oxford, Cambridge, Brighton and Edinburgh."
Currently Edinburgh, Cambridge and Brighton are edging 15% of the voter population of that constituency signing; Bristol West, the highest as far as I can make out from the distribution map, is on 16.5%! In London it is Islington, Holborn, Hornsey and Hackney leading the way....something rings a bell there: Corbyn, Abbott, Starmer...ah, yes, that's what it is...
* When you consider that no-one has actually given good reasons for staying in and when one looks at the dire current (predicted) state of the EU - even if you only see it through the blatantly and increasingly biased goggles of most of the MSM and especially the BBC - and the burning inferno visible on the near-future horizon, the fact that these - for the most part lefty liberal blinkered fools - Remoaners STILL want to stay a part of it is simply unexplainable.
Twats.
Update 23rd March: the similarities with 2016 are complete: MSM news, days after it is common knowledge, still reporting 'over 4 million signatures' with no clarifying statement or mention that numbers may not all be genuine...not surprised.
Update 2: just reading Brendan O'Neill again, simply outstanding:
"Who are these signatories? Where does their sense of entitlement come from? Hard as I try, I cannot get my head around the colossal sense of entitlement it must require to agitate for the overturning of a democratic vote simply because one doesn’t like the outcome. Where does such arrogance come from? What is its source? Celebs and comedians and luvvies have been at the forefront of promoting the petition. I bet many of these people went to the cinema to watch Suffragette in 2015 and Peterloo last year. They may even have shed a tear over these movies about women’s struggle for the right to vote and the bloody massacre in St Peter’s Field of working-class people who wanted the right to vote. And yet here they are openly demanding the obliteration of the votes of millions of women and working-class people. Where does such cognitive dissonance come from? Is it a function of a blinkering sense of entitlement? These are disturbing questions; no doubt the answers are
even more so... ... Everyone who has signed this petition should be ashamed of themselves."
Outing Oxbridge obreption...
Back then, in similar mode, there was Online omni-incompetence: a meaningless petition was started, and back then, like now, it was riddled with foreign and false signatures. Indeed, like then, the snowflakes were mobilised: "...if you go to the petition map you can see where most signatures are coming from: London, Bristol, Oxford, Cambridge, Brighton...yes, you get the idea: [edit 1620 hrs] a student/millennial/snowflake brigade are on a mission...".
Raedwald puts this weeks petition in context: People v. Parliament - the chasm widens: "Even if it reached 17.4m it would still be meaningless; it is open to fraud, abuse, hacking and manipulation. The map is instructive. The greatest proportion of clicks are from Oxford, Cambridge, Brighton and Edinburgh."
Currently Edinburgh, Cambridge and Brighton are edging 15% of the voter population of that constituency signing; Bristol West, the highest as far as I can make out from the distribution map, is on 16.5%! In London it is Islington, Holborn, Hornsey and Hackney leading the way....something rings a bell there: Corbyn, Abbott, Starmer...ah, yes, that's what it is...
* When you consider that no-one has actually given good reasons for staying in and when one looks at the dire current (predicted) state of the EU - even if you only see it through the blatantly and increasingly biased goggles of most of the MSM and especially the BBC - and the burning inferno visible on the near-future horizon, the fact that these - for the most part lefty liberal blinkered fools - Remoaners STILL want to stay a part of it is simply unexplainable.
Twats.
Update 23rd March: the similarities with 2016 are complete: MSM news, days after it is common knowledge, still reporting 'over 4 million signatures' with no clarifying statement or mention that numbers may not all be genuine...not surprised.
Update 2: just reading Brendan O'Neill again, simply outstanding:
"Who are these signatories? Where does their sense of entitlement come from? Hard as I try, I cannot get my head around the colossal sense of entitlement it must require to agitate for the overturning of a democratic vote simply because one doesn’t like the outcome. Where does such arrogance come from? What is its source? Celebs and comedians and luvvies have been at the forefront of promoting the petition. I bet many of these people went to the cinema to watch Suffragette in 2015 and Peterloo last year. They may even have shed a tear over these movies about women’s struggle for the right to vote and the bloody massacre in St Peter’s Field of working-class people who wanted the right to vote. And yet here they are openly demanding the obliteration of the votes of millions of women and working-class people. Where does such cognitive dissonance come from? Is it a function of a blinkering sense of entitlement? These are disturbing questions; no doubt the answers are even more so... ... Everyone who has signed this petition should be ashamed of themselves."
miércoles, 20 de marzo de 2019
Oncoming obrogation?...
The UK voted to Leave the EU 1,000 days ago...
The MPs really are the only problem as they have so ably demonstrated over the last two nearly three years. The last few weeks have been laughable...if you weren't raging, or crying.
Oncoming obrogation?...
The UK voted to Leave the EU 1,000 days ago...
The MPs really are the only problem as they have so ably demonstrated over the last two nearly three years. The last few weeks have been laughable...if you weren't raging, or crying.
viernes, 15 de marzo de 2019
miércoles, 13 de marzo de 2019
Omega out option...
 |
| The Spectator image |
Brexit...16 days to go [countdown]. As widely expected (obvious really) Treason May failed again with her unchanged changed BRINO plan. We are now approaching end game. Today, the treacherous slimey inadequate scum that are many of the UK's MPs will seek to stop the best deal, yes, the BEST deal is what they are calling "no deal" no deal not existing really as an option. They mean the WTO deal, ye DEAL, it is NOT 'no deal'.
I call it the omega option, the last option. I suppose I could have waited until tomorrow for the Greek alphabet reference (14th March is Pi Day in Yankee Doodle date speak) but today quite by chance the numbers coincided: Forget about absurd votes on No Deal – MPs ought to be invoking GATT Article 24, David Campbell Bannerman on Brexit Central. "However, should the UK leave the EU under what is wrongly referred to as a ‘No Deal’, trade deals would then be carried out under the international trade rules of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) that the UK helped establish."
"The 164 member WTO offers Britain a remarkable opportunity to leave the EU cleanly, avoiding all of the apocalyptic predictions set out by the likes of the CBI, Bank of England or Chancellor." [and literally dozens of others]
"Because through GATT Article 24, the EU and UK are able to agree a very basic Free Trade Agreement that would keep tariffs at zero for the duration of the period the two sides negotiate a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement.
Article 24 is by no means a final destination, it is simply a stop gap that would allow Britain to leave the EU on 29th March 2019".
The UK voted to LEAVE. The UK politicians are thwarting that. They will not be forgiven.
The EU has iterated again and again that there will be no more talks with the UK; so any MP voting to remove the WTO deal from the table is knowingly trying to stop Brexit, intentionally working against their country is treason...there will be blood.
Omega out option...
|
| The Spectator image |
"The 164 member WTO offers Britain a remarkable opportunity to leave the EU cleanly, avoiding all of the apocalyptic predictions set out by the likes of the CBI, Bank of England or Chancellor." [and literally dozens of others]"Because through GATT Article 24, the EU and UK are able to agree a very basic Free Trade Agreement that would keep tariffs at zero for the duration of the period the two sides negotiate a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. Article 24 is by no means a final destination, it is simply a stop gap that would allow Britain to leave the EU on 29th March 2019".
The UK voted to LEAVE. The UK politicians are thwarting that. They will not be forgiven.
The EU has iterated again and again that there will be no more talks with the UK; so any MP voting to remove the WTO deal from the table is knowingly trying to stop Brexit, intentionally working against their country is treason...there will be blood.
sábado, 2 de marzo de 2019
Overblown outlook III...
I noticed that it has been nearly 7 years since OOI and OOII but the problems haven't changed much: wind power is a little better off in the percentage of the world’s energy that it provides, i.e. to the nearest whole number, it isn't zero any more. However, even ex environmental 'zealots' (Michael Shellenberger is a Time Magazine 'Hero of the Environment' no less) understand "Why Renewables Can’t Save the Planet" [LINK to the article on Quillette].
"In order to produce significant amounts of electricity from weak energy flows, you just have to spread them over enormous areas. In other words, the trouble with renewables isn’t fundamentally technical—it’s natural." My emphasis; a veritable environmental disaster...
Earlier this year I happened across the image above; what interested me most was the massive imbalance in the European Union's nuclear power plants: France accounts for
45% of all of the EU's operational reactors.
The image isn't 100% up-to-date but things haven't changed much.
The France/Germany nuclear thing had grasped Michael's attention:
"I used to think that dealing with climate change was going to be expensive. But I could no longer believe this after looking at Germany and France.
Germany’s carbon emissions have been flat since 2009, despite an investment of $580 billion by 2025 in a renewables-heavy electrical grid, a 50 percent rise in electricity cost.
Meanwhile, France produces one-tenth the carbon emissions per unit of electricity as Germany and pays little more than half for its electricity. How? Through nuclear power.
Then, under pressure from Germany, France spent $33 billion on renewables, over the last decade. What was the result? A rise in the carbon intensity of its electricity supply, and higher electricity prices, too."
The whole article is a very interesting and balanced read, well worth the time...and the links he provides too.
Overblown outlook III...
"In order to produce significant amounts of electricity from weak energy flows, you just have to spread them over enormous areas. In other words, the trouble with renewables isn’t fundamentally technical—it’s natural." My emphasis; a veritable environmental disaster...
Earlier this year I happened across the image above; what interested me most was the massive imbalance in the European Union's nuclear power plants: France accounts for 45% of all of the EU's operational reactors. The image isn't 100% up-to-date but things haven't changed much.
The France/Germany nuclear thing had grasped Michael's attention:
"I used to think that dealing with climate change was going to be expensive. But I could no longer believe this after looking at Germany and France. Germany’s carbon emissions have been flat since 2009, despite an investment of $580 billion by 2025 in a renewables-heavy electrical grid, a 50 percent rise in electricity cost. Meanwhile, France produces one-tenth the carbon emissions per unit of electricity as Germany and pays little more than half for its electricity. How? Through nuclear power. Then, under pressure from Germany, France spent $33 billion on renewables, over the last decade. What was the result? A rise in the carbon intensity of its electricity supply, and higher electricity prices, too."The whole article is a very interesting and balanced read, well worth the time...and the links he provides too.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)