Salisbury, Wolsey etc are among those people from history with vast although not absolute power with whom Mandy has been compared; others have compared him to fictional characters...not least the amusing hypnotist python Kaa in Jungle Book - you know " trust in me" - and of course the ultimate in sinister aides-de-camp Lord Vader.
sábado, 13 de junio de 2009
Ominous overlording odorivector...
Salisbury, Wolsey etc are among those people from history with vast although not absolute power with whom Mandy has been compared; others have compared him to fictional characters...not least the amusing hypnotist python Kaa in Jungle Book - you know " trust in me" - and of course the ultimate in sinister aides-de-camp Lord Vader.
Ominous overlording odorivector...
Salisbury, Wolsey etc are among those people from history with vast although not absolute power with whom Mandy has been compared; others have compared him to fictional characters...not least the amusing hypnotist python Kaa in Jungle Book - you know " trust in me" - and of course the ultimate in sinister aides-de-camp Lord Vader.
viernes, 12 de junio de 2009
"The real sickness is Labour’s, not Brown’s" "Fraser Nelson says that the governing party has lost its hunger for office — and is now unhealthily dominated by the mega-union Unite and its political chieftain, Charlie Whelan.""Gordon Brown remains Prime Minister, he has formed a new Cabinet — just — and the Parliamentary Labour Party did not rise up on Monday night to defenestrate their leader. On they limp, these shambling, morally broken MPs, muttering to themselves that it could be worse, that catastrophe has been averted, that the moment of maximum danger is behind them. How deceived can a political tribe be? The expenses scandal shed unforgiving light upon a parliament of spivs. Now we have a parliament of zombies."
That last sentence is astounding for a man twice forced to resign from government. "Post-reshuffle, Mandelson wields more power than any peer since Salisbury"... Or, as William Hague said hilariously, "It would be no surprise to wake up in the morning and find that he had become an archbishop" likening Mandy to the power possessed by Thomas - later Cardinal - Wolsey"...it is unfair to blame Gordon Brown entirely for Labour’s demise. Truly awful political leaders do surface from time to time; the question is what their parties do with them. In the last two weeks, it has become devastatingly clear that Labour’s modus operandi is to flail around — and then do nothing. This is not just a matter of cowardice, as important as that doubtless is. There are deeper, institutional reasons for this collective paralysis. For the once-awesome New Labour organism has contracted a disease, which will not only take it out of government but may yet finish it off in opposition, too.
Crucially, Labour has now become a factional government in a way it was not even a fortnight ago. Mr Brown’s attempt to build a ‘government of all the talents’ has ended with a government of virtually none. Instead of Tony Blair’s Big Tent, which notionally had space for everyone, we have Mr Brown’s fiercely defended military bivouac. His key lieutenant, Lord Mandelson, now runs a department so vast that ten ministers report to him (just five report to the Chancellor)."
"Matthew d’Ancona says that, by sticking with Brown, Labour has opted for a mad collective delusion. The party is still in thrall to the trio who invented New Labour and cannot think beyond the Blair-Brown era — an incapacity for which it will pay a terrible price."
"The real sickness is Labour’s, not Brown’s""Gordon Brown remains Prime Minister, he has formed a new Cabinet — just — and the Parliamentary Labour Party did not rise up on Monday night to defenestrate their leader. On they limp, these shambling, morally broken MPs, muttering to themselves that it could be worse, that catastrophe has been averted, that the moment of maximum danger is behind them. How deceived can a political tribe be? The expenses scandal shed unforgiving light upon a parliament of spivs. Now we have a parliament of zombies."
"Fraser Nelson says that the governing party has lost its hunger for office — and is now unhealthily dominated by the mega-union Unite and its political chieftain, Charlie Whelan."
That last sentence is astounding for a man twice forced to resign from government. "Post-reshuffle, Mandelson wields more power than any peer since Salisbury"..."...it is unfair to blame Gordon Brown entirely for Labour’s demise. Truly awful political leaders do surface from time to time; the question is what their parties do with them. In the last two weeks, it has become devastatingly clear that Labour’s modus operandi is to flail around — and then do nothing. This is not just a matter of cowardice, as important as that doubtless is. There are deeper, institutional reasons for this collective paralysis. For the once-awesome New Labour organism has contracted a disease, which will not only take it out of government but may yet finish it off in opposition, too.
Crucially, Labour has now become a factional government in a way it was not even a fortnight ago. Mr Brown’s attempt to build a ‘government of all the talents’ has ended with a government of virtually none. Instead of Tony Blair’s Big Tent, which notionally had space for everyone, we have Mr Brown’s fiercely defended military bivouac. His key lieutenant, Lord Mandelson, now runs a department so vast that ten ministers report to him (just five report to the Chancellor)."
Or, as William Hague said hilariously, "It would be no surprise to wake up in the morning and find that he had become an archbishop" likening Mandy to the power possessed by Thomas - later Cardinal - Wolsey
"Matthew d’Ancona says that, by sticking with Brown, Labour has opted for a mad collective delusion. The party is still in thrall to the trio who invented New Labour and cannot think beyond the Blair-Brown era — an incapacity for which it will pay a terrible price."
"The real sickness is Labour’s, not Brown’s""Gordon Brown remains Prime Minister, he has formed a new Cabinet — just — and the Parliamentary Labour Party did not rise up on Monday night to defenestrate their leader. On they limp, these shambling, morally broken MPs, muttering to themselves that it could be worse, that catastrophe has been averted, that the moment of maximum danger is behind them. How deceived can a political tribe be? The expenses scandal shed unforgiving light upon a parliament of spivs. Now we have a parliament of zombies."
"Fraser Nelson says that the governing party has lost its hunger for office — and is now unhealthily dominated by the mega-union Unite and its political chieftain, Charlie Whelan."
That last sentence is astounding for a man twice forced to resign from government. "Post-reshuffle, Mandelson wields more power than any peer since Salisbury"..."...it is unfair to blame Gordon Brown entirely for Labour’s demise. Truly awful political leaders do surface from time to time; the question is what their parties do with them. In the last two weeks, it has become devastatingly clear that Labour’s modus operandi is to flail around — and then do nothing. This is not just a matter of cowardice, as important as that doubtless is. There are deeper, institutional reasons for this collective paralysis. For the once-awesome New Labour organism has contracted a disease, which will not only take it out of government but may yet finish it off in opposition, too.
Crucially, Labour has now become a factional government in a way it was not even a fortnight ago. Mr Brown’s attempt to build a ‘government of all the talents’ has ended with a government of virtually none. Instead of Tony Blair’s Big Tent, which notionally had space for everyone, we have Mr Brown’s fiercely defended military bivouac. His key lieutenant, Lord Mandelson, now runs a department so vast that ten ministers report to him (just five report to the Chancellor)."
Or, as William Hague said hilariously, "It would be no surprise to wake up in the morning and find that he had become an archbishop" likening Mandy to the power possessed by Thomas - later Cardinal - Wolsey
lunes, 8 de junio de 2009
sábado, 6 de junio de 2009
Obama on Operation Overlord's Omaha...
Five Normandy beaches were attacked simultaneously by a coalition of allied forces. Omaha beach - where US Presiedent Barack Obama visted today [BBC] - was the hardest hit in terms of enemy opposition and death toll. The other landings at the beaches code-named Utah (US) Gold, Juno and Sword (British, Canadian and Commonwealth) had casualties but nowhere near the severe losses at Omaha beach - this isn't to say those other beaches don't deserve the same respect and remembrance as Omaha.
The D-Day campaign lasted 11 weeks and in that time the death toll was higher than in the worst battles of 'The Great War': Verdun 1916 (2,300 per day over 299 days), the Somme 1916 (6,400/day over 142 days) or Passchendaele 1917 (4,600/day over 113 days).
The total included allied soldiers killed, allied aircrew, German combatants, 2,483 Normans with link to the French Resistance that were executed before or during the campaign, civilians killed in the bombing that was a forerunner to the invasion. Details from Peter Caddick-Adams (Military historian) "June 6, 1944: UK's last day as a superpower"