Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta online. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta online. Mostrar todas las entradas

viernes, 15 de julio de 2022

Observing Online order...


Sorry for the lack of posting but the Substack warriors (Steve Kirsch, Igor Chudov, The Naked Emporer and the bad cat amongst others) are saying everything I could possibly say: the fact that almost no politicians or the MSM are still not catching on is very sinsiter indeed...

Anyhoo, just popped in to reblog this posted on Samizdata: Sic transit gloria mundi...

Observing Online order...


Sorry for the lack of posting but the Substack warriors (Steve Kirsch, Igor Chudov, The Naked Emporer and the bad cat amongst others) are saying everything I could possibly say: the fact that almost no politicians or the MSM are still not catching on is very sinsiter indeed... Anyhoo, just popped in to reblog this posted on Samizdata: Sic transit gloria mundi...

viernes, 23 de octubre de 2020

"Otherwise objectionable" otiose?...


Is the excuse/get out of gaol free card/interpretation that Twitter and Facebook use - as they claim innocence due to their being only platforms and not publishers - about to be made redundant? From the Federal Communications Commission's website: FCC General Counsel Thomas M. Johnson Jr. writes "Last week, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his intent to move forward with a rulemaking to interpret Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. Under certain circumstances, Section 230 provides websites, including social media companies, that host or moderate content generated by others with immunity from liability."
"Section 230 provides, among other things, that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." It further provides that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of . . . any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.""


What constitutes material that can be excluded as 'otherwise objectionable'? Well we know that, anything that helps president Trump and/or is a bombshell against a Democrat, most recently Biden and 'the laptop from Hell' to quote The Donald. 

There are critics on both sides, an not just from the 'Orange Man Bad' crew. I heard about it from Dan

Otherwise objectionable gear from: Techdirt 

Update:  'Tech Censorship Is on a Dangerous Path' writes Armstrong Williams at The Daily Signal [LINK]: "The titans of social media, Dorsey at Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook... [  ]...want to control what the public sees, which enables them to better monitor and, ultimately, influence every aspect of society and
life. It is akin to China’s "free speech elite,"...[  ] " As we move closer to stifling free speech and elevating only the viewpoints desired by the Silicon Valley elite, let us remember the words of James Madison:

"Our First Amendment freedoms give us the right to think what we like and say what we please. And if we the people are to govern ourselves, we must have these rights, even if they are misused by the minority. We can never lose sight of this because the moment we do will be the moment we cease to be free.""

"Otherwise objectionable" otiose?...


Is the excuse/get out of gaol free card/interpretation that Twitter and Facebook use - as they claim innocence due to their being only platforms and not publishers - about to be made redundant? From the Federal Communications Commission's website: FCC General Counsel Thomas M. Johnson Jr. writes "Last week, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his intent to move forward with a rulemaking to interpret Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. Under certain circumstances, Section 230 provides websites, including social media companies, that host or moderate content generated by others with immunity from liability."
"Section 230 provides, among other things, that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." It further provides that "[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of . . . any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.""

What constitutes material that can be excluded as 'otherwise objectionable'? Well we know that, anything that helps president Trump and/or is a bombshell against a Democrat, most recently Biden and 'the laptop from Hell' to quote The Donald. 

There are critics on both sides, an not just from the 'Orange Man Bad' crew. I heard about it from Dan

Otherwise objectionable gear from: Techdirt 

Update:  'Tech Censorship Is on a Dangerous Path' writes Armstrong Williams at The Daily Signal [LINK]: "The titans of social media, Dorsey at Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook... [  ]...want to control what the public sees, which enables them to better monitor and, ultimately, influence every aspect of society and life. It is akin to China’s "free speech elite,"...[  ] " As we move closer to stifling free speech and elevating only the viewpoints desired by the Silicon Valley elite, let us remember the words of James Madison:

"Our First Amendment freedoms give us the right to think what we like and say what we please. And if we the people are to govern ourselves, we must have these rights, even if they are misused by the minority. We can never lose sight of this because the moment we do will be the moment we cease to be free.""

viernes, 29 de mayo de 2020

Oval Office online order...







"President Trump, joined by United States Attorney General
William Barr, signed an Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship May 28, 2020"

Yesterday in the Oval Office, amongst other things, President Trump signed this Executive Order to fight online censorship by technology corporations, including social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube...he's looking at you). Everyone I know has various examples but here is a list of many that was linked with this news.



Although this is a good start - and definitely addresses an overt wrong - I hope it doesn't morph into something more sinister.



Update: That said, could it be "Bluster", a warning? A "shot across the bows"? [LINK]

Oval Office online order...


"President Trump, joined by United States Attorney General William Barr, signed an Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship May 28, 2020"
Yesterday in the Oval Office, amongst other things, President Trump signed this Executive Order to fight online censorship by technology corporations, including social media platforms (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube...he's looking at you). Everyone I know has various examples but here is a list of many that was linked with this news.

Although this is a good start - and definitely addresses an overt wrong - I hope it doesn't morph into something more sinister.

Update: That said, could it be "Bluster", a warning? A "shot across the bows"? [LINK]

domingo, 19 de marzo de 2017

Online oriel...








Courtesy of: Visual Capitalist
"The 100 Websites That Rule the Internet". For full-size version click here. "There are over 1.1 billion websites on the internet, but the vast majority of all traffic actually goes to a very select list of them."

Online oriel...



Courtesy of: Visual Capitalist"The 100 Websites That Rule the Internet". For full-size version click here. "There are over 1.1 billion websites on the internet, but the vast majority of all traffic actually goes to a very select list of them."

viernes, 20 de mayo de 2016

Optimistic online outlook...






The vote to Leave or Remain in the EU is hotting up. Interestingly the betters seem to have the Remain side winning easily (you'd think so with the with 99% of the Establishment plus the illegal use of tons of public and EU money AND every failed politician under the sun pushing that way) and most telephone polls also have Remain ahead. Strangely, when looking solely at online polls a completely different picture emerges: click on the picture to enlarge. Scrolling through the Political Betting blog you'll see most pointing towards a Remain win, including THIS craziness. However, online would be more anonymous and as we have seen before many people when polled are loathe to give their true thoughts; I think this is a very positive sign; things are hotting up but things are certainly not decided, either way. By the way, don't forget to Vote LEAVE!

Optimistic online outlook...


The vote to Leave or Remain in the EU is hotting up. Interestingly the betters seem to have the Remain side winning easily (you'd think so with the with 99% of the Establishment plus the illegal use of tons of public and EU money AND every failed politician under the sun pushing that way) and most telephone polls also have Remain ahead. Strangely, when looking solely at online polls a completely different picture emerges: click on the picture to enlarge. Scrolling through the Political Betting blog you'll see most pointing towards a Remain win, including THIS craziness. However, online would be more anonymous and as we have seen before many people when polled are loathe to give their true thoughts; I think this is a very positive sign; things are hotting up but things are certainly not decided, either way. By the way, don't forget to Vote LEAVE!

viernes, 15 de enero de 2016

Occasional online observance...







From Britain Loves Wikipedia

Did anyone ever go to the library every day of the week? They do now and today it's such a 'quick' library: January 15th is the 15th birthday of that library, started in 2001.



Interestingly - well, it surprised me - only just over 13% of the articles are in English, "The English edition of Wikipedia has grown to 5,056,487 articles...Wikipedia has over 38 million articles". I always assumed most would be in English but didn't expect that percentage to be so low! Care to guess what the language with the 2nd highest amount of articles is? I bet you can't guess it right without cheating; and I'd also bet £1000 that you couldn't guess the Top 10 languages with the most articles: there's one or two surprises

Occasional online observance...


From Britain Loves Wikipedia
Did anyone ever go to the library every day of the week? They do now and today it's such a 'quick' library: January 15th is the 15th birthday of that library, started in 2001.

Interestingly - well, it surprised me - only just over 13% of the articles are in English, "The English edition of Wikipedia has grown to 5,056,487 articles...Wikipedia has over 38 million articles". I always assumed most would be in English but didn't expect that percentage to be so low! Care to guess what the language with the 2nd highest amount of articles is? I bet you can't guess it right without cheating; and I'd also bet £1000 that you couldn't guess the Top 10 languages with the most articles: there's one or two surprises